We're discussing evolution here, not abiogenesis.
If you're going to 100% know evolution, you had better know how the first living cell originated, and then be able to prove scientifically how that cell ended up being every creature known to earth throughout its history.
That's possibly the most common error made in any evolution vs creationism discussion.
Abiogenesis: How life began
Evolution: Everything that happened after that.
Yes, I know this. You're not answering my question about the first cell, because you can't answer. You also can't take a one species, and watch it develop into another species. Darwin was the first to point out this troubling part of evolution, so don't feel bad because you obviously don't have the answer.
So, the real question being debated is whether God created man and everything exactly as we see man and everything today, or whether the spark of life gave birth to the evolutionary process.
I'm not a creationist. How many times do I have to post this before you and a few others stop bringing up god? I don't believe in god, either, but I can't disprove its existence. I tend to believe in evolution, but I can't scientifically verify it. It's like blaming mankind for temperature changes, IMO. True Evolutionists who aren't willing to discuss the holes in that theory are really no better than Global Warming Alarmists. It's a faith-based belief.
I believe in the evolutionary process, I'm still pondering on the nature of the spark.
Correct. The process of evolution is a belief. It's not knowledge. Claiming to know exactly how evolution occurs hasn't been done yet.
P.S. Read about Darwin's finches.
That's an example of adaptation, not a new species. Bigger beaks, blah blah blah.
Why are humans so afraid to admit that they don't know everything about the universe?