Author Topic: Thomas Sowell - Early PresidentialProspects  (Read 1211 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline truth_seeker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28,386
  • Gender: Male
  • Common Sense Results Oriented Conservative Veteran
Thomas Sowell - Early PresidentialProspects
« on: January 19, 2015, 07:03:52 pm »
 Early Presidential Prospects

Thomas Sowell

http://www.creators.com/print/conservative/thomas-sowell/early-presidential-prospects.html

With 2015 just getting under way, the buzz of political activity makes it seem almost as if we are already in the midst of the 2016 presidential campaign.

Among the Democrats, Hillary Clinton is honing her message to appeal to the mindset of the left wing of her party, whose support she will need in her second attempt to get the nomination as the Democrats' presidential candidate in 2016.

The left wing's true believers would of course prefer Senator Elizabeth Warren, who gives them the dogmas of the left pure and straight, uncontaminated by reality. But she says she is not running.

Maybe she thinks the country is not ready to put another rookie Senator in the White House. After the multiple disasters of Barack Obama, at home and abroad, that self-indulgence should not be habit-forming.

We can certainly hope that the country has learned that lesson — and that Republican rookie Senators get eliminated early in the 2016 primaries, so that we can concentrate on people who have had some serious experience running things — and taking responsibility for the consequences — rather than people whose only accomplishments have been in rhetoric and posturing.

The more optimistic among us may hope that the Republicans will nominate somebody who stands for something, rather than the bland leading the bland — the kind of candidates the Republican establishment seems to prefer, even if the voters don't.

If the Republicans do finally decide to nominate somebody who stands for something, and who has a track record of succeeding in achieving what he set out to do, then no one fits that bill better than Governor Scott Walker of Wisconsin, who has put an end to government employee unions' racket of draining the taxpayers dry with inflated salaries and extravagant pensions.

That Governor Walker succeeded in reining in the unions, in a state long known for its left-leaning and pro-union politics, shows that he knows how to get the job done. It also shows that he has the guts to fight for what he believes, and the smarts to articulate his case and win the public over to his side, rather than pandering to whatever the polls show current opinion to be.

It is hard to explain how a country in which conservatives outnumber liberals could have elected a far-left Congress and a far-left President of the United States, without taking into account how rare are Republicans able and willing to develop the skills of articulation.

As a result, everyone knows what the Democrats stand for, but even some Republicans in Congress seem to have only a hazy idea of what principles Republicans stand for.

The country does not need glib or bombastic talkers. But it does need people with clarity of thought and clarity of words, along with a clear sense of purpose and an ability to achieve those purposes.

Republicans with these qualities seem far rarer in Washington than in state governments. Governors like Scott Walker in Wisconsin and Bobby Jindal in Louisiana can both talk the talk and walk the walk. In Congress, not so much.

If you think back to the most politically successful Republican presidents of the 20th century — Ronald Reagan, Theodore Roosevelt, Calvin Coolidge and Dwight D. Eisenhower — they were all men who already had the experience of being responsible for results, whether as governors or as a military commander in the case of General Eisenhower.

Those Republican presidents who self-destructed politically — Hoover and Nixon, for example — lacked that kind of background, however much they might have had other assets.

Yet there are a few Republicans in Congress today with both sharply focused minds and sharply focused words. Senator Jeff Sessions and Congressman Trey Gowdy come to mind immediately. If Republicans choose a governor as their presidential candidate in 2016, someone like canny Senator Sessions could make a very valuable contribution as vice-president, able to pass on to a new president the fruits of his experience in the Washington environment, along with his ability to resist the pitfalls of that environment.

In a sense, it is much too early to try to figure out what is going to happen politically in 2016. But, since some campaigns have already begun de facto, it is not too early for the rest of us to start scrutinizing those on the political horizon.

Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305. His website is www.tsowell.com. To find out more about Thomas Sowell and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2015 CREATORS.COM
"God must love the common man, he made so many of them.�  Abe Lincoln

Offline aligncare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,916
  • Gender: Male
Re: Thomas Sowell - Early PresidentialProspects
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2015, 07:36:50 pm »
It's a lot easier to make things worse than it is to make things better. And as we've seen with Obama, missteps can make things much, much worse.

I know what some of you are thinking. But the right ideology/philosophy/rhetoric is not enough to get the job done and make things better. It takes a serious, experienced executive to organize and run an administration.
« Last Edit: January 19, 2015, 07:39:34 pm by aligncare »

Offline aligncare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,916
  • Gender: Male
Re: Thomas Sowell - Early PresidentialProspects
« Reply #2 on: January 19, 2015, 07:44:44 pm »
...Oh, I know what others are thinking, too ... that they are not missteps. All deliberate plan, yada yada. Okay, well, whatever.

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 80,583
Re: Thomas Sowell - Early PresidentialProspects
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2015, 12:27:53 am »
It's a lot easier to make things worse than it is to make things better. And as we've seen with Obama, missteps can make things much, much worse.

I know what some of you are thinking. But the right ideology/philosophy/rhetoric is not enough to get the job done and make things better. It takes a serious, experienced executive to organize and run an administration.

Who do you have in mind?

Offline massadvj

  • Editorial Advisor
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,366
  • Gender: Male
Re: Thomas Sowell - Early PresidentialProspects
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2015, 12:53:01 am »

If being a governor and running things is the end all be all, why don't we just nominate Jerry Brown?  He has run the biggest state in the union something like four or five times, plus his record as a governor is more fiscally responsible than Mitt Romney's.
 

Offline aligncare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,916
  • Gender: Male
Re: Thomas Sowell - Early PresidentialProspects
« Reply #5 on: January 20, 2015, 01:51:31 am »
Executive experience, plus political philosophy. It takes both. Reagan also governed California. But, which governor would you want? Brown or Reagan?

I like Cruz. He takes a stand. I get that. But, he's never run anything.

In a country of 300 million we can't find one person who thinks like Ted Cruz and has the experience of managing like a Mitt Romney?

Anyway, too soon to take to the mattresses.
« Last Edit: January 20, 2015, 01:59:56 am by aligncare »

Offline aligncare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,916
  • Gender: Male
Re: Thomas Sowell - Early PresidentialProspects
« Reply #6 on: January 20, 2015, 02:03:56 am »
Just realized, Sowell didn't actually mention Cruz. Hmm, wonder why his name came to mind?

Oceander

  • Guest
Re: Thomas Sowell - Early PresidentialProspects
« Reply #7 on: January 20, 2015, 02:39:55 am »
...Oh, I know what others are thinking, too ... that they are not missteps. All deliberate plan, yada yada. Okay, well, whatever.

I wish I knew what I was thinking, let alone what others were thinking!   :silly: