Author Topic: Why the Pentagon Is Quadrupling Missile Production, and Why It Still Won't Be Enough  (Read 38 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 42,882
Why the Pentagon Is Quadrupling Missile Production, and Why It Still Won't Be Enough

David Kowalski  ·  April 1, 2026  ·  11 min read


Here is a number worth sitting with: at peak consumption during the early months of support to Ukraine, the United States was shipping Javelin anti-tank missiles faster than Lockheed Martin could build them. Within ten months, the Stinger man-portable air defense inventory, a weapon system that took decades to accumulate, was functionally depleted. Over 7,000 Javelins, roughly one-third of the entire U.S. stockpile, were transferred before the Pentagon paused shipments to protect its own readiness.

That was a proxy conflict. The missiles were not being fired by American forces. And yet the drawdown was severe enough to trigger what has become the largest guided-munitions production expansion since the Cold War.

On March 25, 2026, the Department of Defense announced a sweeping set of production agreements with Lockheed Martin, BAE Systems, and Honeywell, deals designed to quadruple output of some of America's most critical missile systems over the next seven years. Earlier, on February 4, RTX (formerly Raytheon) had signed five separate agreements to dramatically scale Tomahawk and SM-6 production. The combined effort represents tens of billions in investment and a fundamental restructuring of the defense industrial base.

The ambition is real. The question is whether it is remotely sufficient.  .  .  .

https://militarymachine.com/pentagon-missile-production-surge-2026

If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Jim Jones was a socialist Democrat.

Online Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 42,882
Relevant to our current conflict in Iran.  We are a slow bureaucratic elephant chasing speedy rats in the corn crib.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Jim Jones was a socialist Democrat.