Why Are Male-Identifying Democrat Candidates All Creepy Weirdos?
Kurt Schlichter
If you ever wanted irrefutable evidence of Democrats’ hate for white men, all you’d have to do is point to the rogues’ gallery of weirdos, losers, and mutations they’ve nominated over the last few election cycles. It’s like they don’t actually know any normal white dudes, because the people they pick in a baffling attempt to recapture this large and crucial group of voters—who have almost completely rejected the Democrats—are simply bizarre. How did they ever get the impression that these freakish nominees would somehow make normal white guys go, “Yeah, I identify with him. I’ll vote for him. Now, it’s off to the Porta-Potty with some champagne and a dozen roses.”
As a male-identifying person of paleness, I’d be pretty insulted if I gave a damn what Democrats thought. I’m just happy to see them screwing up with my demographic.
And they really are screwing up with it. Here’s the conundrum. They need our votes, but they don’t like us. White guys aren’t welcome in the Democrat Party, at least not unless they have some sort of asterisk and a total dedication to the ideology. With Pete Buttigieg, who has definite Ivy League Alfred E. Neuman vibes, the asterisk is that he’s gay. That made him tolerable, along with his absolute willingness to submit himself to bizarre left-wing orthodoxy. You remember how roads are racist? He managed to do that with a straight face. Yeah, homeboy knew where his bread was buttered, and it’s his slavish devotion to leftist weirdness that gets him a pass on being a person of pallor. Well, except for among blacks, where he polls an amazing 0% for 2028.
more
https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2026/06/08/why-are-male-identifying-democrat-candidates-all-creepy-weirdos-n2677356
