Author Topic: Democrats a bottomless pit of rigging and scheming -- just look at their plans for the Georgia Supre  (Read 41 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 419,934
Democrats a bottomless pit of rigging and scheming -- just look at their plans for the Georgia Supreme Court

Stacey Abrams wants to replicate the Wisconsin model for the courts in Georgia.

Monica Showalter | May 18, 2026

What is it about Democrats and ever more grandiose riggings?

They've hatched a new plan to 'make Georgia Wisconsin' in that they plan to politicize the state Supreme Court race, which, up until now, had been a studiously nonpartisan affair.

Not surprisingly, two-time losing gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams and her judge sister are behind it.

According to Wall Street Journal columnist Jack Butler:

    Democrats want to transform what have been largely staid affairs in the Peach State into partisan battles, with Wisconsin as a model. If it succeeds, the effort likely won’t end there.

    ... Stacey Abrams, who remains an influential Democrat in Georgia despite losing two races for governor to Republican Brian Kemp, made the connection clear in a campaign ad urging voters to help the state “become a Wisconsin.” Chris Taylor, who won the April Wisconsin Supreme Court race, has been even more direct. She endorsed Miracle Rankin and Jen Jordan, who are running against incumbent Justices Charlie Bethel and Sarah Hawkins Warren, respectively.

    Until this year, it was rare for a sitting member of Georgia’s nine-member Supreme Court to have a challenger, much less a serious one. Georgia judicial races are nonpartisan. The state’s judicial code of ethics prohibits candidates and sitting judges from presenting themselves publicly as political actors. But elections in Wisconsin and in Georgia itself furnish the precedent for a new kind of race.

So, instead of focusing on 'affordability,' as many Democrat candidates (all full of focus-group information) claim to be doing (without details), the real powers that matter have come up with a new rigging plot to ensure that court cases become political sh-- shows, and Democrats control the 'narrative' about what 'fair' judges are. This, despite politics itself being the opposite of 'fair' and unbiased.

more
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/05/democrats_a_bottomless_pit_of_rigging_and_scheming_just_look_at_their_plans_for_the_georgia_supreme_court.html
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

"Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience"
Mark Twain


“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34


Smokin Joe: Stupid people vote. If you have enough of them, you don’t need to steal an election

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,841
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
I have no problems with the election of judges by "the people".

I realize this will often lead to high degrees of political polarization, but that's expected... and, NORMAL for these times.

Judges at ALL levels -- no matter what they claim -- are "political" creatures. Some of them keep it under wraps better than do others.

And finally, I have no problem with the REMOVAL of judges by "the people", as well.
That includes EVERY judge in the United States of America, local, state, federal.

Who here knows who Rose Bird was, and what happened to her?