Cosmos, by Carl Sagan (1980)
[This is but a small sample of the nonsense and self-contradictions by Carl Sagan, in each of his books I have read. I sent these reviews to his publisher and Sagan wrote back to me, ignoring his many errors, asking me to purchase his newest book. I never bought one. I got them from the library, but sold his letter on E-Bay for $125 to a fellow in Hong Kong.]
P 207: “When we get home (after 30,000 Earth years), few of our friends would be left to greet us.” (A little astronomer “humor”, folks.)
P 210: “Perhaps in another century or two . . . we will have the will and the resources and the technical knowledge to go to the stars.” (But you said “we could build Orion now”.P 206. Is such inconsistency “scientific”?)
P 212: “From the point of view of a star, a human being is a tiny flash...” (Do stars really see THAT well? In PBD, Page 32: “In 1989 only 30% of people surveyed said the sun is not alive. We can recognize here a shortcoming . . .” What is the star’s “point of view” on this “shortcoming”?)
P 241: “A star twenty times the mass of the Sun will shrink . . . slip through a self-generated crack in the space-time continuum and vanish from our universe.” (You can’t fool a scientist.)
P 243: “Our ancestors worshiped the Sun, and they were far from foolish.” (Except for theologians, militarists, nationalists, and other “chauvinists”.)
Ibid: “If we must worship a power greater than ourselves, does it not make sense to revere the Sun and stars?” (PBD, Page 32: “We can recognize here a shortcoming [that 70% of people surveyed think the sun is alive]”.)
P 250: “That we live in a universe which permits life is remarkable.” (P 5: “Every star may be a sun to someone.” The “remarkable” is profoundly mundane, in Sagan’s inconsistent point of view.)
P 257: “In many cultures it is customary to answer that God created the universe out of nothing. But this is mere temporizing. We must, of course ask next where God comes from. And if we decide this to be unanswerable, why not save a step and decide that the origin of the universe is an unanswerable question.” (Because THEN scientists subsidized scientists would be out of a job. And we couldn’t have that, could we? More precisely, not all questions are within the realm of science to answer. Who would be so foolish to suggest otherwise? Where is it written that all things are scientifically explicable?)
P 270: “There may be a million worlds in the Milky Way Galaxy alone that at this moment are inhabited by beings very different, and far more advanced.” (Page 301: Sagan develops that number with the Drake Equation to be N~10, and “as small as 1".)
Ibid: “Of those million worlds inhabited by advanced intelligences . . .” (One, ten, a million. What are 5 or 6 orders of magnitude among friends and fellow scientists?)
P 273: “The systematic murder of such intelligent creatures (as whales) is monstrous.” (Not a whisper of the monstrosity of, say, partial birth abortion.)
P 276: “The information in the nucleus of our cells would fill a thousand volumes.” (“Evidence of much poor planning”, P 57, Pale Blue Dot, also by Sagan)