In defense of white flight

[mystery-ak]

In defense of white flight

A mythology has emerged that blames white flight for the impoverishment of black communities, which should be soundly rejected as false.

Bill Ponton | May 14, 2026

The term “white flight” has a strong negative connotation in polite society. It is a term often used to tar the motives of my father’s generation who, after returning from service in WWII, chose to live in the suburbs rather than return to the confines of the cities in which they had grown up. Their motives were many; however, as white flight continued throughout the ‘50s and ‘60s, there is no question that it was driven by the knowledge that city neighborhoods that were formerly inhabitable were falling into disarray with the influx of blacks that had moved there. To say otherwise, flies in the face of what was observed at the time and exists today in tangible form in cities like Detroit, Cleveland, St. Louis, Newark, Chicago, Philadelphia, and Baltimore, to name a few.

In recent decades, some white, affluent residents have moved back into central-city neighborhoods. This is sometimes described as a reversal of white flight, something that many had wished would happen. However, it was not long before this “gentrification” movement had a negative light cast upon it. As a classic example of white guilt knowing no bounds, the reinvestment in and reinvigoration of city neighborhoods brought accusations that longtime black residents were being displaced. The historical irony of the situation seeming to be lost on many.

A mythology has emerged that blames white flight for the impoverishment of black communities. Explanations have emerged from academia as to how government policy dealing with housing finance, highways, schools, zoning, and taxation have created wealthy white suburbs at the expense of black neighborhoods. However, these are only strained attempts to deflect from inherent failures within the black community whose fate has been in the hands of black leaders for over a half century. White flight was a major force in 20th-century American urban history, but mythology that paints it as a bad thing should be rejected as false.

more
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/05/in_defense_of_white_flight.html

[DefiantMassRINO]

white flight ... who wouldn't want a better life for their families?

Whites fled from the failed policies of urban politicians and elites.

When "blighted" urban neighborhoods were torn down to make way for interstate highways and brutalist Soviet-style concrete monstrosities, working class ethnic whites fled.

When crime was tolerated by urban police, courts, and politicians, whites fled.

When banks red-lined neighborhoods, whites fled.

When a Federal judge said your child could not attend the school in your own neighborhood, whites fled.

When public education policy was dictated by Teachers' Unions and social promotions became the norm, whites fled.

Specifically, working-class and middle-class whites fled the social re-engineering architected by Post-War academic urban liberal elites in the cities.

Many of the poorer neighborhoods of Boston were poor Irish, Italian, and Jewish neighborhoods before they became poor black neighborhoods.

When the middle-class leaves, it's a sign that politicians have foresaken quality-of-life issues for corruption or liberal nonsense.  When votes at the ballot box no longer get results, people start voting with their feet.

Today's Socialist Progressives are looking to repeat the failed liberal policies of the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s.  Who wouldn't want to run away from stupid politicians repeating the mistakes of the past?

[IsailedawayfromFR]

If the Dems get back into power, they will nationalize the country to have the red states subsidize the disaster of the blue states economies.  All urban areas will be prioritized at the expense of rural areas.

Think price controls, energy price caps, EV and climate schemes, mass transportation etc. and horrible policies like no Electoral college or government run stores and companies.

Means white flight to better places will not exist unless one leaves the US for a country that has more freedom.

Good luck finding that.

[Fishrrman]

ISailed wrote:
"Means white flight to better places will not exist unless one leaves the US for a country that has more freedom.
Good luck finding that."

It's been tried once before.
That attempt failed, but that in itself doesn't mean it could be tried again, and succeed.

This is no longer "The United States of America".
It has now become "The DISUnited States of America".

On one side remain "the traditional-freedom states".
On the other, "the new slavery states".
And now we even have one or two "emerging green (muslim) states".

We are seeing a good number of white folks fleeing the new slavery states for the traditional freedom states. Could turn into a flood if things get really bad.

Although I've been posting in this forum for years now that perhaps the last truly "livable" state in the country may be -- of all places -- Vermont. There's a reason for that, and it ain't political. Can you guess what that reason is...?

[rustynail]

What's needed is defense of White Fight.

[Wingnut]

What's needed is defense of White Fight.

A negro that can keep his lawn mowed and good BBQ.