Author Topic: Isaacman before Congress: Speaking the truth to power  (Read 140 times)

Elderberry and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online Elderberry

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,062
Isaacman before Congress: Speaking the truth to power
« on: April 24, 2026, 08:47:43 am »
Behind the Black 4/23/2026

There has been a lot of attention given by the propaganda press to the testimony yesterday by NASA administrator Jared Isaacman before the House Science Committee, with almost all of that coverage focused on two issues, Trump’s proposal to cut NASA’s budget significantly, and the public statement by Isaacman that two Lunar Gateway modules were delivered “corroded.”

On the corrosion issue, much of the press focused on whether Isaacman’s statement is true (contractors are denying it). I instead was struck by how little pushback there was overall from Congress about Isaacman’s proposal to cancel Gateway entirely. In two hours of testimony, only one congressman brought it up, and even he did not challenge Isaacman’s decision very strongly.

Put simply, it really didn’t matter whether these modules were corroded or not. Congress is not going to challenge Isaacman on this decision. Some politicians might use it in fund-raising letters or at press events as a hammer to win votes or donations, but when it comes time to approve NASA’s budget, they are willing to accept Isaacman’s overall judgment. Gateway will be gone.

As for the budget cuts, I was also struck by the lack of hard opposition from Congress, despite reporting from the propaganda press (like this story) suggesting the cuts were rejected outright. Though repeatedly Isaacman was questioned about those cuts — especially from Democrats — repeatedly he fought back hard, to good effect. He supports Trump’s cuts and does not want more money, because in reviewing NASA’s budget and recent actions, he has found there is ample cash available in Trump’s reduced budget by simply shutting down bad or duplicative projects and focusing his resources more effectively.

More: https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/essays-and-commentaries/isaacman-before-congress-speaking-the-truth-to-power/#more-123248

Online Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 66,753
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
Re: Isaacman before Congress: Speaking the truth to power
« Reply #1 on: April 24, 2026, 06:40:52 pm »
What is a "Gateway Module?"
I don’t owe tolerance to people who disagree with my existence.
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Online bigheadfred

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,837
  • Gender: Male
  • One day Closer
Re: Isaacman before Congress: Speaking the truth to power
« Reply #2 on: April 24, 2026, 06:46:12 pm »
What is a "Gateway Module?"

Lunar space station
She asked me name my foe then. I said the need within some men to fight and kill their brothers without thought of Love or God. Ken Hensley

Online BobfromWB

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,001
  • Gender: Male
  • Fishing the line, Bristol Bay, AK. Memories ...
Re: Isaacman before Congress: Speaking the truth to power
« Reply #3 on: Today at 10:00:25 am »
What is a "Gateway Module?"

It was supposed to be the first stop for the Artemis III mission, the crew would transfer from the Orion capsule to the lunar lander already docked and descend to the surface. If anything when wrong with the Orion on the way to the Moon, the crew would have a safe place to stay until help came. The initial modules would be added to in the future to expand it.

Possible to use it to launch the first Mars mission, which would be far cheaper and easier to do, since the gravity well of Earth would be avoided. Using its high elliptical lunar orbit, some amount of time and fuel would be shaved off the Mars mission.


Democrats would rather rule over ashes than govern a functioning Republic

Online BobfromWB

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,001
  • Gender: Male
  • Fishing the line, Bristol Bay, AK. Memories ...
Re: Isaacman before Congress: Speaking the truth to power
« Reply #4 on: Today at 10:22:40 am »
Behind the Black 4/23/2026

There has been a lot of attention given by the propaganda press to the testimony yesterday by NASA administrator Jared Isaacman before the House Science Committee, with almost all of that coverage focused on two issues, Trump’s proposal to cut NASA’s budget significantly, and the public statement by Isaacman that two Lunar Gateway modules were delivered “corroded.”

On the corrosion issue, much of the press focused on whether Isaacman’s statement is true (contractors are denying it). I instead was struck by how little pushback there was overall from Congress about Isaacman’s proposal to cancel Gateway entirely. In two hours of testimony, only one congressman brought it up, and even he did not challenge Isaacman’s decision very strongly.

Put simply, it really didn’t matter whether these modules were corroded or not. Congress is not going to challenge Isaacman on this decision. Some politicians might use it in fund-raising letters or at press events as a hammer to win votes or donations, but when it comes time to approve NASA’s budget, they are willing to accept Isaacman’s overall judgment. Gateway will be gone.

As for the budget cuts, I was also struck by the lack of hard opposition from Congress, despite reporting from the propaganda press (like this story) suggesting the cuts were rejected outright. Though repeatedly Isaacman was questioned about those cuts - especially from Democrats - repeatedly he fought back hard, to good effect. He supports Trump’s cuts and does not want more money, because in reviewing NASA’s budget and recent actions, he has found there is ample cash available in Trump’s reduced budget by simply shutting down bad or duplicative projects and focusing his resources more effectively.

More: https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/essays-and-commentaries/isaacman-before-congress-speaking-the-truth-to-power/#more-123248

I find the whole funding thing bizarre - it takes more money to do thing right and safely, not less. By eliminating the Gateway, one safety step is eliminated from the entire enterprise. It no secret that, if the Chinese were not trying to go to the Moon first, 47 would have closed out the entirety of NASA. He seems to have a visceral hate for the agency.

The major reason that NASA's lunar mission is so far behind and reusing old odds and ends, is the lack of funding. Most of this blame lies on Congress, but with 47 hatred added in, it is far more severe.

As it is, the program needs $200 billion in funding to do the program correctly and safely, without the shoestring budget currently in use. But Isaacman is on thin ice with 47, so he has to go along with the 'Plan,' say what he does to make everything look swell, when it really is not.

NASA has already shut down critical programs - one being the Mars Sample Return Mission. The entire Mars program from its inception was to return samples to Earth to verify whether or not Mars had or still has life. Without that mission all the money spent on Mars all the billions and billions is a total loss.

The Chinese have their own Mars sample mission and its on track for 2030-33 time frame. So if there is life on Mars, they will find it first. And since all the recent tests point to there being life, they will be able to proclaim it as verified.

Now if there was a possibility of golf courses and resorts on Mars, 47 would be all over it.

Democrats would rather rule over ashes than govern a functioning Republic

Online Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 66,753
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
Re: Isaacman before Congress: Speaking the truth to power
« Reply #5 on: Today at 10:29:38 am »
Now if there was a possibility of golf courses and resorts on Mars, 47 would be all over it.

 *****rollingeyes***** The TDS in you couldn't resist, could it? *****rollingeyes*****

Somebody has already golfed on the moon.
« Last Edit: Today at 10:31:54 am by Cyber Liberty »
I don’t owe tolerance to people who disagree with my existence.
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed: