The media are substituting grim predictions for positive facts about the Iran War
This is a propaganda technique intended to force defeat by destroying public support for the war, despite America’s spectacular battlefield successes.
Andrea Widburg | March 28, 2026
I’m just old enough to remember watching CBS News nightly reporting on the Vietnam War, which always ended with the talking head numbering the American dead and wounded from that day’s fighting. Despite this depressing ending, the top reporting was always anchored in actual facts: ‘On this day, American troops did X or Y.’ However, Vietnam was also the war when the leftist media discovered that negative spin worked.
That spin is now part of the warp and woof of the media’s reporting on the current war. Facts are subordinate to predictions, and the predictions are all negative. While our military is fighting the most spectacularly successful war in human history, the media have it losing a hypothetical war premised on all the grim things that “experts” predict might happen, either during the war itself or in its aftermath.
This is no way to report a war. It is, however, a superb way to disseminate what was once defined as treasonous propaganda during a war.
Here’s just a sampling of the type of negativity the media are churning out, not regarding what’s actually happening (Iran’s military and political infrastructure has been wiped out in just a month), but focusing instead on all the possible future worst-case scenarios—a negativity that, in turn, inevitably leads to investor concerns:
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/03/the_media_are_substituting_grim_predictions_for_positive_facts_about_the_iran_war.html