Author Topic: Federal judge rules Trump can’t require citizenship proof on the federal voting form  (Read 361 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 192,025

Federal judge rules Trump can’t require citizenship proof on the federal voting form
Story by ALI SWENSON and NICHOLAS RICCARDI • 14h

NEW YORK (AP) — President Donald Trump’s request to add a documentary proof of citizenship requirement to the federal voter registration form cannot be enforced, a federal judge ruled Friday.

U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly in Washington, D.C., sided with Democratic and civil rights groups that sued the Trump administration over his executive order to overhaul U.S. elections.
 
She ruled that the proof-of-citizenship directive is an unconstitutional violation of the separation of powers, dealing a blow to the administration and its allies who have argued that such a mandate is necessary to restore public confidence that only Americans are voting in U.S. elections.

“Because our Constitution assigns responsibility for election regulation to the States and to Congress, this Court holds that the President lacks the authority to direct such changes,” Kollar-Kotelly wrote in her opinion.
 

She further emphasized that on matters related to setting qualifications for voting and regulating federal election procedures “the Constitution assigns no direct role to the President in either domain.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/federal-judge-rules-trump-can-t-require-citizenship-proof-on-the-federal-voting-form/ar-AA1PACPL?ocid=widgetonlockscreen&cvid=6905e1d54cd14b1684db9ac2c0ea740c&ei=115
“Our government teaches the whole people by its example. If the government becomes the lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy.” Louis D. Brandeis

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 192,025

“Because our Constitution assigns responsibility for election regulation to the States and to Congress, this Court holds that the President lacks the authority to direct such changes,” Kollar-Kotelly wrote in her opinion.
 
She further emphasized that on matters related to setting qualifications for voting and regulating federal election procedures “the Constitution assigns no direct role to the President in either domain.”
 

I think the ruling is correct.  However, it didn't stop the reporter from taking a jab at Trump, did it?
 
« Last Edit: Saturday, Nov 01, 2025 03:34 am by rangerrebew »
“Our government teaches the whole people by its example. If the government becomes the lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy.” Louis D. Brandeis