Patrick J. Michaels’ “Meltdown” uncovers controversy of global warming narratives
09/16/2025 / By Belle Carter
Patrick J. Michaels, in his book “Meltdown: The Predictable Distortion of Global Warming by Scientists, Politicians, and the Media,” questions the prevailing narrative on global warming, arguing that it is exaggerated and distorted by scientific practices, political influences and media portrayals.
Michaels criticizes the competitive nature of scientific funding, which he believes prioritizes alarmist predictions over more measured assessments, leading to a cycle of distortion. He highlights flawed computer models and unrepresentative observations used in climate assessments.
Michaels argues that global warming has become heavily politicized, with powerful interests shaping the narrative. He accuses the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) of relying on questionable assumptions and outdated economic models, leading to inflated predictions of global warming and its impacts.
Michaels accuses media outlets of sensationalism, claiming they amplify the most alarming predictions while ignoring more moderate voices. He provides examples of media reports on studies that have not been peer-reviewed or have been debunked, contributing to public misunderstanding and fear.
Despite criticism from some scientists who argue he downplays the risks of global warming, Michaels contends that his goal is to provide a more balanced and accurate picture of the science, challenging readers to rethink their assumptions about climate change.
https://www.climate.news/2025-09-16-meltdown-patrick-michaels-uncovers-global-warming-controversy.html
