Challenging the mainstream: The NIPCC report on climate change
09/03/2025 / By Kevin Hughes
The 2009 Climategate emails revealed IPCC-affiliated scientists manipulating data, suppressing dissent and exaggerating global warming claims. Evidence showed collusion to bypass FOIA requests, delete inconvenient data and blacklist skeptical scientists — proving the “scientific consensus” was politically manufactured.
CO2 is essential for plant growth, and higher levels may enhance agricultural yields and medicinal plant production. Earth’s climate has always fluctuated naturally due to solar activity, ocean cycles and geological factors — current warming is not unprecedented.
IPCC models overestimate CO2’s warming effect (likely only 0.3 C–1.1 C per doubling) and fail to account for natural events like solar cycles. The “97 percent consensus” claim is debunked — studies show far less agreement, with many scientists rejecting IPCC conclusions due to methodological bias.
The IPCC operates as a political body, prioritizing alarmism over objective science to justify centralized control. Scientists face career pressures, grant incentives and censorship, leading to confirmation bias and agenda-driven research.
Instead of ineffective carbon taxes and green energy mandates, societies should focus on adaptation — preparing for natural climate shifts. The NIPCC advocates for independent, transparent science free from corporate and government conflicts of interest.
In the ongoing debate over global warming, a new report is challenging the established narrative and prompting a reevaluation of the science behind climate change. “Climate Change Reconsidered,” a 400-page analysis by the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC), offers a compelling counter-argument to the widely accepted views of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). This report, authored by Dr. Craig D. Idso, Robert M. Carter and S. Fred Singer, and discussed in their book “Why Scientists Disagree About Global Warming: The NIPCC Report on Scientific Consensus,” raises critical questions about the IPCC’s findings and calls for a more balanced and transparent approach to climate science.
https://www.censoredscience.com/2025-09-03-challenging-mainstream-nipcc-report-on-climate-change.html
