Author Topic: "Where were you when I needed you?" On the DOE CWG and the biases of the climate beat  (Read 53 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 181,676
"Where were you when I needed you?"
Climate scientist Jos de Laat on the DOE CWG and the biases of the climate beat
Roger Pielke Jr.
Aug 18, 2025

Fact checkers hard at work
 
This is a guest post by Jos de Laat, an accomplished climate scientist at the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI). Jos explains of this guest post — “this is first and foremost a personal note on events unfolding the last couple of weeks that I had to get off my chest as they struck a particular sensitive chord.” I am thrilled to be able to bring Jos’ voice to a broader audience. For me, Jos experiences below provide a bit of a window into “consensus” enforcement by a small group of scientists and reinforced by their allies in the media. Jos writes something that I hear from a lot of scientists: “I felt powerless to set the record straight.” You are invited to discuss Jos’ post in the comments below. — RP

Share The Honest Broker

A Guest Post by Jos de Laat
Just like Roger, I have recently been invited by both CarbonBrief and the Associated Press to comment on the recent DOE CWG report as one of my papers was referred to in that report. Associated Press also asked if I could provide my thoughts on the associated EPA proposal and would be willing to answer to a number of questions.


The citation and context for de Laat and Maurellis (2006) in the DOE CWG report.

The paper in question was de Laat and Maurellis (2006), a follow up study of de Laat and Maurellis (2004). Both papers appeared in respectable journals (International Journal of Climatology and Geophysical Research Letters) but are not particularly special in terms of citations –—twenty to eighty citations depending on the paper and how citations are counted.

https://rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/where-were-you-when-i-needed-you
The unity of government which constitutes you one people is also now dear to you. It is justly so, for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize. But as it is easy to foresee that, from different causes and from different quarters, much pains will be taken, many artifices employed to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth.  George Washington - Farewell Address

Offline Canuck Conservative

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 666
  • Gender: Male
  • Nature-loving Conservative!
something that I hear from a lot of scientists: “I felt powerless to set the record straight.”

Anyone can speak up against lies, but most don't have the balls to challenge the prevailing "Establishment" ... these guys were just afraid of the consequences for their careers, like most scientists are

Real scientists speak up for the truth ... Copernicus and Galileo challenged the prevailing sun-centric ideas of the 1500s, and were punished for it ... but eventually proved right.

Pasteur and Einstein were rebels in their own way, and vilified for their radical ideas ... but they too were proved right.

Scientists with the guts to speak up for the truth, when the prevailing consensus is the opposite, are rare (just look at the Covid fiasco!)
FreeRussia is controlled by a small group of anti-free-speech Nazis - no wonder its donations are down!!