Author Topic: Trump goes off on Josh Hawley over insider trading bill  (Read 257 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Timber Rattler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,396
  • Conservative Purist and Patriot
Trump goes off on Josh Hawley over insider trading bill
« on: July 30, 2025, 08:26:48 pm »
Quote
President Trump on Wednesday went off on one his closest allies in Congress, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) over voting in committee on a bill that would ban stock trading by lawmakers, presidents and vice presidents, arguing that Hawley teamed up with Democrats to advance the measure.

The bill would ban congressional lawmakers and their spouses from trading stocks as well as presidents and vice presidents, but the latter would only apply to future administrations.

Still, Trump, in a social media post, went off on Hawley claiming that he was being used by Democrats to target the president. He also questioned Hawley being the lone Republican on the panel to vote with Democrats 8-7 to advance the bill out of committee.

“Why would one ‘Republican,’ Senator Josh Hawley from the Great State of Missouri, join with all of the Democrats to block a Review, sponsored by Senator Rick Scott, and with the support of almost all other Republicans, of Nancy Pelosi’s Stock Trading over the last 25 years. The information was inappropriately released just minutes before the Vote — Very much like SABOTAGE!” Trump said on Truth Social.


EXCERPT

So Trump SUPPORTS insider trading by congress critters, their spouses, future presidents, and VPs?

 :pootrump:

He said it here...

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114944074791548865

So Trump's already lost North Carolina with Tillis walking away because of his threats and now he will want to primary Hawley?

« Last Edit: July 30, 2025, 08:30:21 pm by Timber Rattler »
aka "nasty degenerate SOB," "worst of the worst at Free Republic," "Garbage Troll," "Neocon Warmonger," "Filthy Piece of Trash," "damn $#%$#@!," "Silly f'er," "POS," "war pig," "neocon scumbag," "insignificant little ankle nipper," "@ss-clown," "neocuck," "termite," "Uniparty Deep stater," "Never Trump sack of dog feces," "avid Bidenista," "filthy Ukrainian," "war whore," "fricking chump," "psychopathic POS," "depraved SOB," "Never Trump Moron," "Lazarus," and "sock puppet."

"In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act."  ---George Orwell

Online mountaineer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 62,915
Re: Trump goes off on Josh Hawley over insider trading bill
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2025, 07:33:32 am »
Didn't Hawley explain to Jesse Watters that the bill applies only to Congress, not the President nor VP?
"The spirit of Kukluxism will not die out so long as the Democrat party exists to sympathize with that spirit."
-- Gerrit Smith

Offline Timber Rattler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,396
  • Conservative Purist and Patriot
Re: Trump goes off on Josh Hawley over insider trading bill
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2025, 11:37:18 am »
Didn't Hawley explain to Jesse Watters that the bill applies only to Congress, not the President nor VP?

Just future Presidents and VPs but not Trump or Vance, which makes Trump's anger and threats very curious since it doesn't apply to him.
aka "nasty degenerate SOB," "worst of the worst at Free Republic," "Garbage Troll," "Neocon Warmonger," "Filthy Piece of Trash," "damn $#%$#@!," "Silly f'er," "POS," "war pig," "neocon scumbag," "insignificant little ankle nipper," "@ss-clown," "neocuck," "termite," "Uniparty Deep stater," "Never Trump sack of dog feces," "avid Bidenista," "filthy Ukrainian," "war whore," "fricking chump," "psychopathic POS," "depraved SOB," "Never Trump Moron," "Lazarus," and "sock puppet."

"In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act."  ---George Orwell

Online Free Vulcan

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,122
  • Gender: Male
  • Ah, the air is so much fresher here...
Re: Trump goes off on Josh Hawley over insider trading bill
« Reply #3 on: July 31, 2025, 12:01:01 pm »
Will have to disagree with Trump on this one. It needs to end, or congressional portfolios will have to be put under a great deal more transparency that I'm sure their owners will absolutely not want to happen.
The Republic is lost.