Scott Jennings Skewers the Democrats for Exactly Why They Are Hemorrhaging Voters

[rangerrebew]

Scott Jennings Skewers the Democrats for Exactly Why They Are Hemorrhaging Voters
By Nick Arama  | 2:24 PM on July 05, 2025

 
The reaction of the Democrats to New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani says something about how lost they are as a party. When you're embracing someone who has used the radical language he has, you may have a problem.
 

As Rebecca Downs at our sister site Townhall reported, Democratic strategist Joel Payne tried to square that circle during a panel discussion on "CNN NewsNight With Abby Phillip" on Thursday:

"Democrats actually should be happy that we have folks, again, who have a wide range of appeal that are within our tent," Payne claimed. "And you're going to need Zohran Mamdanis and people who are moved by Zohran Mamdani as a part of a bigger Democratic coalition."

"So, yes, he might not use the language, he might not actually line up with the agenda of every other Democrat across the country, but that's okay. I mean, you, big tent parties need to have room for people who do not actually align pure--purely with every single thing that the master party says," he continued, as he went after Jennings for chuckling about such a point.

https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2025/07/05/scott-jennings-remarks-on-dem-diversity-n2191270#google_vignette

[Fishrrman]

Title and presumption:
"Scott Jennings Skewers the Democrats for Exactly Why They Are Hemorrhaging Voters"

I don't buy this.

I'll go out on the limb and proffer that in the next presidential election if someone as radical as Zohran Mamdani is on the ballot (yes, I realize he's not "Constitutionally qualified", but what about that other muslim who was elected to two terms not so long ago?), he would STILL garner 35-40% of the "democratic" vote by simply having the (D) next to his name. And that's just out of the starting gate.

It's baked into 'em.
And that's not changing.

[Smokin Joe]

Title and presumption:
"Scott Jennings Skewers the Democrats for Exactly Why They Are Hemorrhaging Voters"

I don't buy this.

I'll go out on the limb and proffer that in the next presidential election if someone as radical as Zohran Mamdani is on the ballot (yes, I realize he's not "Constitutionally qualified", but what about that other muslim who was elected to two terms not so long ago?), he would STILL garner 35-40% of the "democratic" vote by simply having the (D) next to his name. And that's just out of the starting gate.

It's baked into 'em.
And that's not changing.

Zombies...