NASA Confirms Atmospheric Shift Over North America

[rangerrebew]

NASA Confirms Atmospheric Shift Over North America
 
On a crisp spring morning that seemed like any other, NASA dropped a revelation that stunned meteorologists and weather enthusiasts across the world: the agency has confirmed a significant atmospheric shift over North America. Imagine stepping outside, expecting the familiar feel of the wind or the scent of rain, only to sense that something fundamental has changed. That’s the kind of jolt this announcement has given the scientific community and the millions who rely on predictable weather. The atmosphere, our invisible shield and lifeline, is transforming before our eyes. What does this mean for our daily lives, our seasons, and the future of the continent? The answers are as fascinating as they are urgent. Let’s dive into what’s really happening above us right now.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/topstories/nasa-confirms-atmospheric-shift-over-north-america/ss-AA1FcuKp?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=HCTS&cvid=03d4b9d1454e412aaf81b83f8895ab0b&ei=20

[rangerrebew]

Would this have been exposed by NASA under Biden?

[Smokin Joe]

Back to something I have brought up more than just a few times.

We have been removing tremendous amounts of kinetic energy from prevailing wind currents for the purpose of generating electricity using windfarms. These wind currents facilitate atmospheric mixing, and that mixing removes some of the differences between air masses (humidity, temperature, and by virtue of those, density--atmospheric pressure). Those density differences between air masses may be less gradational as a result, meaning mixing zones would be more turbulent and result in more severe weather--not caused by global warming, but ironically, caused at least in part by one of the claimed solutions to alleged warming--and because of the more pronounced differences between air masses, new mixing patterns may be less predictable.

[jafo2010]

I listened to a scientist a few years ago explain why the climate change scientists were absolutely wrong with their assessments.  First, he said that 31 of the 32 countries that embraced the notion of climate change had made false assumptions.  Why are there any assumptions with these models?  He claimed only one country had their model correct, and that it indicated there was climate change, but it was inconsequential.

Now we have NASA spouting SCIENCE.  I would not trust these federal hacks any further than I could throw them.

Simple logic dictates that the weather is constantly changing.  It is not constant.  That is science, and I do not have a PhD!

I remember vividly in the late 70s that we were headed into an ice age, per the scientists.  Remember that?  Yeah!  Well, in the late 70s, I remember going over one full month in the PA, NJ area, and the high never reached above freezing, 32 degrees F.  It was cold as sh*t!  It was a miserable time. 

Now, these pukes at NASA are saying we have changing this or that.  Well guess what, I can tell you 3, 5 10 years from now, those weather patterns will change again, and guess what, YES, AGAIN.  Weather is not constant, and we have to be smarter about this.  Enough draining the pockets of the taxpayer for the latest brain child of idiot scientists!!!!!!!!!   ENOUGH ALREADY!!!!!!!!

[Canuck Conservative]

[DB]

Back to something I have brought up more than just a few times.

We have been removing tremendous amounts of kinetic energy from prevailing wind currents for the purpose of generating electricity using windfarms. These wind currents facilitate atmospheric mixing, and that mixing removes some of the differences between air masses (humidity, temperature, and by virtue of those, density--atmospheric pressure). Those density differences between air masses may be less gradational as a result, meaning mixing zones would be more turbulent and result in more severe weather--not caused by global warming, but ironically, caused at least in part by one of the claimed solutions to alleged warming--and because of the more pronounced differences between air masses, new mixing patterns may be less predictable.

Humans have a knack for setting in motion the very thing they claim to be trying to prevent...