Author Topic: Attorney General Pam Bondi says Supreme Court could get involved in Alien Enemies Act case  (Read 6794 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline libertybele

  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 64,998
  • Gender: Female
Attorney General Pam Bondi says Supreme Court could get involved in Alien Enemies Act case

WASHINGTON — Attorney General Pam Bondi once again attacked members of the judiciary in a Fox News interview Sunday, criticizing federal judges who have struck down or paused portions of President Donald Trump’s agenda and saying the Supreme Court will ultimately hear the court battle over the administration’s use of the Alien Enemies Act.

“The Supreme Court will get involved,” Bondi said on Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures.” “This is an out of control judge, a federal judge, trying to control our entire foreign policy, and he cannot do it.”

Trump administration officials and the president himself have repeatedly criticized judges who have ruled against the administration. Trump has called for the impeachment of U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, who is presiding over the case involving the administration’s use of the rarely invoked Alien Enemies Act to deport what officials claim are gang members to El Salvador.

In a Truth Social post on Sunday, Trump doubled down on his attacks against Boasberg, writing that he is a “Constitutional disaster.”

Bondi echoed Trump on Sunday, saying, “These judges are out of control.”

The judges she criticized were Boasberg; U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is presiding over a case involving the Environmental Protection Agency’s attempt to cancel up to $20 billion in grants for climate initiatives; U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes, who blocked Trump’s ban on transgender people enlisting or serving in the military; and U.S. District Judge Theodore Chuang, who ruled that the Department of Government Efficiency’s efforts to dismantle the U.S. Agency for International Development “likely violated the United States Constitution in multiple ways.”

“We are going to fight back, and we are going to win, and the Supreme Court will be ready to hear these cases again,” she said. “These are federal district judges who are trying to control our nation’s agenda.”...................

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/attorney-general-supreme-court-involved-alien-enemies-act-case-rcna197682

Offline rustynail

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,743
The Supremes are likely to rule against Trump and unleash the Judges.  Then what?

Offline libertybele

  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 64,998
  • Gender: Female
The Supremes are likely to rule against Trump and unleash the Judges.  Then what?
That's always a possibility...and if that should happen, then once again her reputation takes a hit, because she's expressed confidence that the case will be heard and that they're going to win.

Trump and Bondi are up against Roberts and Barrett.  Good luck.

Then the next step????   :shrug:
« Last Edit: March 23, 2025, 05:24:55 pm by libertybele »

Offline MeganC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,914
  • Gender: Female
  • Putin, the low rent Hitler
The Supremes are likely to rule against Trump and unleash the Judges.  Then what?

Then it will be time to find out who runs our country.
Resistance to Jim Robinson is obedience to God.

Offline Canuck Conservative

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 404
  • Gender: Male
  • Nature-loving Conservative!
Trump and Bondi are up against Roberts and Barrett.  Good luck.

Well, they also have the Constitution on their side ... if the SC says lowly unelected judges have the final say in any Government policy, then that means those lowly judges are the ones running the Government, and there's no point in having any more elections.
FreeRussia is controlled by a small group of anti-free-speech Nazis - no wonder its donations are down!!

Offline libertybele

  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 64,998
  • Gender: Female
Well, they also have the Constitution on their side ... if the SC says lowly unelected judges have the final say in any Government policy, then that means those lowly judges are the ones running the Government, and there's no point in having any more elections.

Just because they have the Constitution on their side, doesn't mean that Roberts will rule accordingly.  It is up to SCOTUS to interpret the law and in the past his rulings have slanted liberal when it comes to Trump. Barrett leans liberal as well.

Yes we have a huge problem in the country; the Chief Justice is compromised. 

No further elections?  It could come to that.  Anyone thinking that we got a fair election back in '20 is fooling themselves.