Author Topic: CFACT Comments on the California Offshore Wind Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PE  (Read 286 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 176,803
CFACT Comments on the California Offshore Wind Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS)
 
February 15th, 2025
 
CFACT Comments on the California Offshore Wind Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS)

By Craig Rucker, President

CFACT

https://www.cfact.org/

Submitted to https://www.regulations.gov/document/BOEM-2023-0061-0189

February 12, 2025

Overview of our concerns

BOEM is taking comments on a draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) for its five floating wind offshore leases off the California coast. This is BOEM’s second offshore wind PEIS. The first was for a set of leases off New York which featured fixed bottom turbines. This is the first PEIS for floating wind turbines which are very different from the fixed turbines being built along the Atlantic coast.

Floating wind is still an immature technology with a large number of proposed designs none of which has been tested at commercial utility scale. There are just a handful of small demonstration scale projects in the world.

There are at least two useful things about this PEIS. First is a pretty good tutorial on floating wind with a focus on the California case. This is Appendix A, done by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. They rule out a number of design options including the most popular that has been demonstrated, the spar floater. The huge range of options they present shows the immaturity of the technology

Second the PEIS includes an encyclopedic discussion of numerous potential adverse impacts of a generic floating wind project. These impacts are limited to just what is contemplated for each of the five leases so when combined for all five leases it is clear that this Program will be environmentally destructive. These adverse impacts cannot be mitigated so the correct decision is that the Program should not proceed. The No Action Alternative is the proper choice.

Here is just a short list of some of the major flaws in the PEIS

https://www.cfact.org/2025/02/15/cfact-comments-on-the-california-offshore-wind-draft-programmatic-environmental-impact-statement-peis/
The unity of government which constitutes you one people is also now dear to you. It is justly so, for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize. But as it is easy to foresee that, from different causes and from different quarters, much pains will be taken, many artifices employed to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth.  George Washington - Farewell Address

Offline IsailedawayfromFR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,894
California can build these monstrosities but not one penny of federal funds should go into it
« Last Edit: February 16, 2025, 10:28:43 am by IsailedawayfromFR »
“You will never understand bureaucracies until you understand that for bureaucrats procedure is everything and outcomes are nothing.” Thomas Sowell