People want 'better', not 'worse'.
Those are valuations that vary from individual to individual.
The problem for the Dems is that their 'better' only helps a few that are selected by them - college graduates, illegal immigrants, limousine liberal Global Climate Change hypocrites, the Circus freak show tent, etc.
The Republicans have two years to define their 'better' and sell it to American voters. Lowering the cost of living for individuals and families is a 'better' both sides need to execute or obstruct for the 2026 midterms.
The dilemma for Republicans is that 'better' for indivuduals and families may mean enforcing anti-trust laws to prevent monopolies, oligopolies, cartels, etc., from mainting their current pricing power.
Why is only one factory owned by one company providing the vast majority of baby formula in the US?
Why is only one factory owned by one company providing the vast majority of saline for hospitals?
Over-concentration of market power can lead to increase price risk, economic risk, health risk, and national security risk to America and its people.
A necessary component of Adam Smith free market economics is competition to awaken Darwinian spirits within the economy to drive innovation, progress, and efficiencies.
Wall Street has a proclivity towards over-concetration of markets to achieve anti-competitive, and inflationary, pricing power.
To help drive down prices, those with established pricing power need competitive challengers to make use of supply side economics to drive down prices.
This has a potential to drive a wedge between Big Business conservatives and Free Market conservatives.
Free Market conservatives and Fiscal conservatives are near extinct and have been marginalized in the modern GOP. The Big Business Republicans may have the critical mass necessary to stop implementing populist free market policies to drive up competition and drive down prices.