Popular Rationalism by James Lyons-Weiler 10/13/2024
RED ALERT: IS FDA'S QUIET OCTOBER REORGANIZATION CREATING A NEW POLICING ARM A RESPONSE TO WEF'S DEMANDS TO CONTROL OR SHUT DOWN LOCAL FOOD PRODUCTION?Obedience to globalist masters predicted to backfire. If you object, grow more food than you ever have before as a direct response to WEF's audacity and attempt at overreach. Watchdogs: Watch the OII.
If the FDA’s new enforcement capabilities are used to crack down on local food production in favor of large-scale, centralized operations, the country’s food supply will become increasingly controlled by multinational corporations and global standards, rather than the needs and desires of local communities and individuals. Here is evidence that the WEF is wrong on carbon.
On October 1, 2024, the FDA, the U.S. agency responsible for protecting public health by ensuring the safety of food, drugs, and medical devices, undertook its largest reorganization in decades. This restructuring created the Office of Inspections and Investigations (OII), a new policing arm designed to oversee and enforce regulations across all FDA-regulated products. The FDA has presented this as part of a broader strategy to “modernize” the agency and respond to global challenges such as emerging technologies, food safety concerns, and the impacts of “globalization” (see: FDA Modernization Efforts for Establishing a Unified Human Foods Program, New Model for Field Operations and More).
From the FDA’s web page: “The FDA is focused on transforming the agency to be more efficient, nimble and ready for the future with the ever-changing and complex industries we regulate, including the emergence of new food technologies, the impacts of globalization, climate change and other factors that require the FDA to quickly adapt to an evolving world. ”
There are concerns that this reorganization is a response to calls from global organizations, particularly the World Economic Forum (WEF), for coordinated international efforts to combat issues like climate change and, more recently, calls for global control and influence over local food production.
From this report:
“Economic Shifts: Will nations engage in cooperative trade through open markets or adopt more isolationist policies? How will confidence in commodity markets evolve? Will markets be more resilient or more volatile? Will the price of food accurately and consistently capture the externalities of health costs and environmental impact? What will be the impact of trade policies on global and local markets? Will there be an increased number of breadbaskets that supply most of the world’s food? Will food systems become more centralized or more localized and where will decision-making power be held?”
The WEF, an unelected body of influential political and corporate leaders, has promoted far-reaching agendas to transform global food systems, including demands for reduced meat consumption. A WEF-funded study alleges that urban food gardens produce more carbon than large agriculture. Globalists cite ‘food waste’, ignoring that scraps are used to feed fowl that control insects, and can be used in compost. The group, citing environmental concerns, seems desperate to have say over locals, regardless of which country they reside.
More:
https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/red-alert-is-fdas-quiet-october-reorganization?publication_id=475124&post_id=150172725&isFreemail=true&r=cjt3t&triedRedirect=true
