Joe Oliver: Climate alarmism contradicts scientific method
Joe Oliver.
A petition to the Court in The Hague by three leading American scientists challenges the basic premises of net-zero policies focused on CO2.
By Joe Oliver.
An expert opinion, submitted pro bono to the Court of Appeal in The Hague in November last year by three leading American scientists, presents a damning refutation of climate catastrophism. Their conclusions contradict the sacred beliefs of alarmists, including that man-made carbon dioxide will cause dangerous climate change, negating the desirability, let alone the necessity, of net-zero policies that would impose $275 trillion in useless spending on rich countries by 2050 and hurt the poorest people in the world's poorest economies. Predictably, the study has been ignored by the mainstream media.
Richard Lindzen.
The three scientists are: Richard Lindzen, professor emeritus of earth, atmospheric, and planetary sciences at MIT; William Happer, professor emeritus of physics at Princeton; and Steven Koonin, NYU professor, senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, and author of the 2021 book: Unsettled: What climate science tells us, what it doesn't, and why it matters. Although they are seriously outnumbered in their views, they are not alone. John Clauser, who won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2022, said:
https://www.climategate.nl/2024/07/joe-oliver-klimaatalarisme-in-strijd-met-wetenschappelijke-methode/
