Author Topic: Chuck Schumer tries to override 'MAGA' Supreme Court's Trump immunity ruling by introducing No Kings  (Read 643 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline libertybele

  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 64,998
  • Gender: Female
Chuck Schumer tries to override 'MAGA' Supreme Court's Trump immunity ruling by introducing No Kings Act

Presidents have some immunity, according to the Supreme Court.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-New York) announced Thursday his plan to introduce new legislation that would undercut the Supreme Court's recent immunity ruling.

The act, if passed, would make clear that Congress has the authority to decide "to whom federal criminal laws may be applied," instead of the Supreme Court, according to the proposed legislation, NBC News reported.

In response to a motion filed by Donald Trump's legal counsel, the Supreme Court ruled last month that the former president is entitled to "absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority." He also has "at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts," the high court found.

As a result of the Supreme Court's ruling, a federal case against Trump that alleged he unlawfully maintained classified documents after his presidency — one of the four cases lodged against Trump — was recently dismissed by United States District Judge Eileen Cannon, who determined that special counsel Jack Smith's "appointment and funding" were "unlawful."

The judge's decision to toss the case sparked outrage from Trump's Democratic opponents.

In the days following the ruling, Schumer wrote on X, "We were all taught in grade school that there are no kings here in America. But what the MAGA Justices have done is effectively place a crown on Trump's head."

He announced lawmakers were working on a bill to classify Trump's actions listed in the cases as "unofficial acts." As part of the Supreme Court's ruling, it determined that current and former presidents are not entitled to immunity for unofficial acts; however, it did not define what constitutes an official or unofficial act.

On Thursday, one month after the high court's decision, Schumer stated that he plans to propose the No Kings Act to undo the "disastrous immunity ruling" by the "MAGA Supreme Court."

"The Founders were explicit: no man in America shall be a king. But the MAGA Supreme Court threw out centuries of precedent and anointed Trump and subsequent presidents as kings above the law. That's why I'm introducing the No Kings Act to crack down on this dangerous precedent," Schumer wrote in a post on X..................

https://www.conservativereview.com/chuck-schumer-tries-to-override-maga-supreme-court-s-trump-immunity-ruling-by-introducing-no-kings-act-2668861006.html

Offline Kamaji

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 48,301

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 401,753
Schumer won’t commit to Biden SCOTUS overhaul vote, but keeps bill to strip Trump’s immunity
August 2, 2024 | Frieda Powers

President Joe BIden’s plan to overhaul the U.S. Supreme Court got a boost from Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) who introduced legislation to strip former President Trump of immunity.

Last month, the high court ruled that former presidents have broad immunity from being criminally prosecuted for official acts. But days after Biden announced his radical plan to transform the Supreme Court, Schumer introduced the “No Kings Act” in an attempt to “clarify” that the Constitution does not, in fact, give presidents immunity from criminal prosecution.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TCWfdw1oBw&ab_channel=ForbesBreakingNews

Schumer blasted the Supreme Court’s ruling as “dangerous and devastating” in a statement.

“The MAGA Supreme Court has once again subverted the will of the American people, and the very idea of democracy itself,” the New York Democrat said.

“The Founders were explicit – no man in America shall be a king. Yet, in their disastrous decision, the Supreme Court threw out centuries of precedent and anointed Trump and subsequent presidents as kings above the law. Given the dangerous and consequential implications of the Court’s ruling, legislation would be the fastest and most efficient method to correcting the grave precedent the Trump ruling presented. With this glaring and partisan overreach, Congress has an obligation – and a constitutional authority – to act as a check and balance to the judicial branch,” Schumer added.

more
https://www.bizpacreview.com/2024/08/02/schumer-wont-commit-to-biden-scotus-overhaul-vote-but-keeps-bill-to-strip-trumps-immunity-1476960/
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline PeteS in CA

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,534
The USSC ruling was based on the USC, not a statute. A statute cannot override the USC.
I am not and never have been a leftist.

If, as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2021/robert-f-kennedy-jr-said-the-covid-19-vaccine-is-the-deadliest-vaccine-ever-made-thats-not-true/ , https://gospelnewsnetwork.org/2021/11/23/covid-shots-are-the-deadliest-vaccines-in-medical-history/ , The Vaccine is deadly, where in the US have Pfizer and Moderna hidden the millions of bodies of those who died of "vaccine injury"?

Millions now living should have died. Anti-Covid-Vaxxer ghouls hardest hit.

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,346
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
Bill of Attainder.
(the target is Mr. Trump)

What will the old men of the Supreme Court say to that?

Offline GtHawk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,531
  • Gender: Male
  • Well EXCUSE me!
I want to know when we can get a No POS Act for the congress and senate 9999hair out0000