Author Topic: A Heavy Dose of Reality for Electric-Truck Mandates  (Read 163 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 166,555
A Heavy Dose of Reality for Electric-Truck Mandates
« on: May 07, 2023, 11:43:46 am »
A Heavy Dose of Reality for Electric-Truck Mandates
10 hours ago Charles Rotter 57 Comments

The website of American Trucking Associations had an interesting blog post last month concerning electric mandates for the Trucking industry. It is focused on the testimony of Andrew Boyle, ATA first vice chair and co-president of Massachusetts-based Boyle Transportation before a Senate Environment and Public Works Subcommittee on the future of clean vehicles.

A cut from his opening remarks:


Boyle’s testimony demonstrated the disconnects between mandates and the real-world.


From the article.

After one trucking company tried to electrify just 30 trucks at a terminal in Joliet, Illinois, local officials shut those plans down, saying they would draw more electricity than is needed to power the entire city.

A California company tried to electrify 12 forklifts. Not trucks, but forklifts. Local power utilities told them that’s not possible.

Costs, sourcing and reliability are being ignored

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2023/05/06/a-heavy-dose-of-reality-for-electric-truck-mandates/
The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.
Thomas Jefferson

Offline Smokin Joe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57,005
  • I was a "conspiracy theorist". Now I'm just right.
Re: A Heavy Dose of Reality for Electric-Truck Mandates
« Reply #1 on: May 07, 2023, 08:58:16 pm »
A vehicle at roughly twice the cost, with load capacity reduced by 8,000 lbs per battery (two to four required) and a range roughly 1/10 of that of a current long haul diesel between charges?

IOW to move the same amount of freight as two diesel trucks 1200 miles would take three electrics, and nine or ten charging cycles of 8 hours or more.

With a co-driver the diesels could be there in 24-30 hours.

The electrics would be charging up at about 1/3 of the way there. DOT rules might permit the drivers to take the time spent charging as 'rest time', halving the necessary crew, but that does not compensate for how slowly the cargo would move. This would be especially critical in thee case of time sensitive cargoes which required controlled temperatures to arrive intact, be they pharmaceuticals or blueberries or frozen meat, which would impose extra draw on the batteries, shortening the range or reducing the cargo capacity of the truck.

That is, IF the charging infrastructure even existed.

In short, this is an idea that is not ready for prime time. Entire regions would be limited to the produce that can be grown locally, severely reducing variety and availability in a time when we are all told to "eat healthy". Pharmaceuticals could not be delivered in a timely fashion by truck, and would have to be shipped by air, impacting consumers with additional cost.

How God must weep at humans' folly! Stand fast! God knows what he is doing!
Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

C S Lewis