Watch: MIT climate scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen rips climate narrative: ‘The public has been made to think’ that peer-review means a study ‘is somehow proven right & now it’s fact & it’s nothing of the sort’
By: Admin - Climate DepotFebruary 14, 2023 11:02 AM
Lindzen: “Before World War II peer review was very rare and if I have students read papers from the 19th century or the early 20th century they’re quite surprised to read them why because they’re informal their Communications they’re not assertions of Truth they are looking for truth uh and um you know after the war for a variety of reasons peer review entered largely because there was too much demand for publication may even have been a shortage of paper but for instance the quarterly Journal of the royal Meteorological Society in the UK had a wonderful statement of what the reviewer was supposed to do and it said you can only reject a paper for two reasons one is an overt mathematical error or lack of originality the paper then would be discussed at the monthly meeting and the discussion would be included with the paper there is no essential thought that peer review I mean peer review the public has been made to think that this is the certification of the paper that it is somehow proven right now it’s fact, and it’s nothing of the sort.”
What Does the Science Say? | Dr. Richard Lindzen | Jordan Peterson Podcast
The Dr Jordan B Peterson Podcast
Jordan B Peterson
Dr Jordan B Peterson and Dr. Richard Lindzen dive into the facts of climate change, the models used to predict it, the dismal state of academia, and the politicized world of “professional” science.
https://www.climatedepot.com/2023/02/14/watch-mit-climate-scientist-dr-richard-lindzen-rips-climate-narrative-the-public-has-been-made-to-think-that-peer-review-means-a-study-is-somehow-proven-right-now-its-fact-its-nothing/
