Author Topic: How Nonsense Masquerades As Science: Climate “Code Red” Example  (Read 451 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 184,556
How Nonsense Masquerades As Science: Climate “Code Red” Example
BY BRIGGS ON OCTOBER 31, 2022 • ( 15 COMMENTS )

This post is also available as a podcast. As you can tell, I recently lost my voice; and the bad news is that it was found, partially. Or listen on YouTube..
 
One of the reasons for broken science is nonsense being passed off as science. Today’s example, and a prominent example, too, comes from the peer-reviewed journal BioScience. From the paper “World Scientists’ Warning of a Climate Emergency” by William Ripple and others.

Now the word emergency isn’t undefined or unfamiliar: we know the difference between an emergency and a matter of concern, or even a problem. Further, we know the word so well that we know the weather we experience is not any kind of emergency, even if it might, possibly, someday, perhaps, who knows, maybe be a problem. Which it now is not; a problem, that is, let alone emergency. The weather is not acting in any extraordinary way.

Even though we know the word, it doesn’t have a scientific meaning. Emergency, as a word, has no place in scientific discourse. And neither does code red, a term used in the article’s opening sentences: “We are now at ‘code red’ on planet Earth. Humanity is unequivocally facing a climate emergency.”

What—what precisely—is a code red? Is it different from a code orange or code puce? What—what precisely—differentiates code red from code indigo? How many codes are there, and how do we measure or categorize without ambiguity their characteristics?

https://www.wmbriggs.com/post/43218/
abolitionist Frederick Douglass: “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did, and it never will.”

Offline DefiantMassRINO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,463
  • Gender: Male
Re: How Nonsense Masquerades As Science: Climate “Code Red” Example
« Reply #1 on: November 02, 2022, 01:37:23 pm »
Scientists are research grant whores.

If there's a research grant for it, they'll study it.

If they want more research grant money, they'll reach a conclusion that there is a crisis or emergency that needs more immediate study ... with the help of more research grants.

"Political correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it’s entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end." - Alan Simpson, Frontline Video Interview

Online ChemEngrMBA

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,783
"I have now purchased and given away six copies of the book!  Well done sir!" - Bigun
5 Star Review by LMAO
The Book Commentary: "The book (Brilliant Creations - The Wonder of Nature and Life) is pure genius."
Review by John Orosz, M.D. "Wow, beyond outstanding. Please send me twenty signed copies for colleagues, family, and libraries."
"This book should be required reading for every teenager.  I was running every morning for twenty years with a genius." - Mike McCartney, D.D.S.
"You have the most agile mind of anyone I know." -
Avice Marie Griffin, PhD, Clinical Psychologist