Transgendered in Kindergarten? What’s Really Behind the Insane New Sex Ed?

[Fishrrman]

https://www.theepochtimes.com/transgendered-in-kindergarten-whats-really-behind-the-insane-new-sex-ed_4388260.html

Transgendered in Kindergarten? What’s Really Behind the Insane New Sex Ed?

by Roger L. Simon
April 7, 2022

NOTE: when reading articles at The Epoch Times, DISABLE javascript in your browser. This can be done with the click of the mouse using free add-ons/extensions.

N is for Nonbinary and T is for Trans.

Did you know that?

If you were a Williamson Country, Tennessee, kindergartner and clicked on the book “The GayBCs” on the iPad given by your school for you to take home over the weekend, you would.

You’d also know the B is for Bi. (You can shout it out loud/ “I like boys and girls/ and that makes me proud.”)

C is—needless to say—for Coming Out and D is—what else—for Drag.

I won’t bother you with the noxious doggerel accompanying those—you can probably make it up for yourself. And no, it’s not a product of Disney, although, given recent developments, it almost seems as if it were. It was published in 2019 by Quirk Books with a recommended age range of 4 to 8.

According to GeekDad, this is “A great way to introduce 26 words to kids while teaching them to read.”

Teaching them to read? Do you teach the average 5-year-old reading with the word “nonbinary” (not to mention “I is for Intersex”)? Well, maybe if your kid is John Stuart Mill who is said to have learned Greek at age 3.

Actually, GeekDad inadvertently let the cat out of the bag. “The GayBCs” are educationally meaningless, in fact, an educational fraud. Hardly any children at that age are prepared to learn to read from them, with or without the traditional parental accompaniment.

It would most likely do the reverse, make the child so overwhelmed and baffled by what would have to be incomprehensible concepts for them, he or she (apologies for the old-fashioned pronouns) could be turned off reading altogether. It certainly wouldn’t help.

Even Mill undoubtedly wouldn’t have had the maturity to deal with bisexuality at the age of 4, a far more complicated emotional question than the largely intellectual challenge of learning a language.

But that emotional challenge is what is being put in front of the children of rich and Republican Williamson County and undoubtedly many other places across the country.

More at URL above...

[Kamaji]

The next step, of course, will be to legalize, first, sexual relations between adults and children under 13, and second, "marriage" between same.

This was the course that was limned out after Obergefell.

[jmyrlefuller]

Why are they targeting the youth?

Because they know it is far easier to manufacture a reasonable facsimile of the opposite of a person's biological sex before that person hits puberty. The fact remains, up until very recently, trans people (especially men who transitioned to women) looked like freaks—they landed in that "uncanny valley" of looking just enough like their biological sex to disturb people. If they can get the kids transitioning before puberty, the aim is to create a body that is, in everything but genetics, identical in form to the opposite sex. (The whole functioning womb part is still a sticking point, though.)

And that is the goal: to totally detach biology and genetics from the sociopolitical aspects of gender. It is a societal deconstruction at its worst. These lobbyists only want chaos, and by golly, they're getting it.