Hmmmmm ...... 6 months from my last injection .... looking at my "calendar", I see a nice half marathon, several nice 5Ks around New Year, possibly a nice 10K or half a little later in January ... hmmmmmmmmmmm, no plan for a booster.
Maybe along about December I'll get an antibody test to see where I'm at.
Don't be so smug in your "accepted science" dear soul.
A dose of humility may allow you to recover from the damage that your (obvious) case of normalcy bias has led you to.
But it is your life, choose wisely.
(Tell us, if you so desire, why you persist in blind adherence to the lies of the pharmaceuticals and government. Are you one that questions every other thing that they expose and dictate, yet give them a pass on matters pertaining to your health and well being? Do you see them as benevolent dictators that are interested in keeping you alive?)
In your haste to mock my post you entirely missed my point, so I will explain what I thought totally clear:
* The FDA recommendation for people over 65 to which Biden was referring is to get a booster six months after their second dose of Pfizer;
* I am over 65, received Pfizer, and 6 months after my second dose will be in the December-January time frame;
* My plans for that time frame include a number of activities in which I will be around hundreds or thousands of people who are not part of my family or work circles (= potential exposure);
* My plans for the December-January time frame do not include getting the booster Biden & Krew say I should get.
My planned 10Ks will be a distance I've not done in an in-person running/walking event since late 2019, and I've not been able to complete a half marathon since late 2017, but those facts were peripheral or less to the point of my post.
