Author Topic: Biden At His Latest Rally: “America is dead because of COVID-19” (Video)  (Read 754 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 384,682
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Biden At His Latest Rally: “America is dead because of COVID-19” (Video)
By
Sarah Hall -
October 31, 2020

Former Vice President and current Democratic Party presidential candidate Joe Biden raised eyebrows when he made the solemn proclamation that “America is dead because of COVID-19” at a drive-in campaign rally in Des Moines, Iowa on Friday.

Biden warned that Americans will face a “dark winter” during the final presidential debate. He reiterated the message on Friday.

“I think it’s up to thirty-thousand people have died. America is dead because COVID-19 [CCP virus],” Biden said. “Nearly one thousand seven hundred dead right here in Iowa.”

Biden went on to repeat his signature phrase “we choose hope over fear.”

more w/video
https://redstatenation.com/biden-at-his-latest-rally-america-is-dead-because-of-covid-19-video/
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline catfish1957

  • Laken Riley.... Say her Name. And to every past and future democrat voter- Her blood is on your hands too!!!
  • Political Researcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,860
  • Gender: Male
The thought that this guy still might win is crazy.  America is Dead?  He is truly the anti-Reagan!!!!!!
I display the Confederate Battle Flag in honor of my great great great grandfathers who spilled blood at Wilson's Creek and Shiloh.  5 others served in the WBTS with honor too.

Offline catfish1957

  • Laken Riley.... Say her Name. And to every past and future democrat voter- Her blood is on your hands too!!!
  • Political Researcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,860
  • Gender: Male
An "America is Dead" (per Chicom Joe) Bump
I display the Confederate Battle Flag in honor of my great great great grandfathers who spilled blood at Wilson's Creek and Shiloh.  5 others served in the WBTS with honor too.

Offline skeeter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,717
  • Gender: Male
The thought that this guy still might win is crazy.  America is Dead?  He is truly the anti-Reagan!!!!!!
Biden could soil himself on stage and it would mean nothing. Whether he wins or not no one will have voted for Him.

Offline Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 80,478
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
While Biteme won't say he wants America dead, it's an obituary he's looking forward to reading.
For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death — if you’re unvaccinated — for themselves, their families, and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm. Sloe Joe Biteme 12/16
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Offline libertybele

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57,994
  • Gender: Female
Biden could soil himself on stage and it would mean nothing. Whether he wins or not no one will have voted for Him.

@https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/pittsburgh-post-gazette-endorses-trump-for-handling-of-economy-chinaic

Exactly.  A huge, undeniable landslide victory is what it's going to take for Trump to win and even at that, I'm sure the votes will still be contested in some states; however, if I recall correctly, they can only be contested if the margin is within a questionable range.  But we have also entered an unprecedented territory this election with so many mail-in votes that they may be able to challenge and contest votes until they win.

@Victoria33 would certainly be able to enlighten us on the rules; and if she has already done so, I apologize for missing her input.
Romans 12:16-21

Live in harmony with one another; do not be haughty, but associate with the lowly, do not claim to be wiser than you are.  Do not repay anyone evil for evil, but take thought for what is noble in the sight of all.  If it is possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all…do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.

Offline Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 80,478
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
@https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/pittsburgh-post-gazette-endorses-trump-for-handling-of-economy-chinaic

Exactly.  A huge, undeniable landslide victory is what it's going to take for Trump to win and even at that, I'm sure the votes will still be contested in some states; however, if I recall correctly, they can only be contested if the margin is within a questionable range.  But we have also entered an unprecedented territory this election with so many mail-in votes that they may be able to challenge and contest votes until they win.

@Victoria33 would certainly be able to enlighten us on the rules; and if she has already done so, I apologize for missing her input.

It's about "Who pays for a recount?"  If it's within a threshold like 0.5% (probably varies between the states) the recount is automatic and the State pays for it.  Outside of that, a recount can still happen, but somebody else has to pay.  I believe Clinton payed for a couple of states to have a recount in 2016.
For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death — if you’re unvaccinated — for themselves, their families, and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm. Sloe Joe Biteme 12/16
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Offline Victoria33

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,457
  • Gender: Female
@https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/pittsburgh-post-gazette-endorses-trump-for-handling-of-economy-chinaic

Exactly.  A huge, undeniable landslide victory is what it's going to take for Trump to win and even at that, I'm sure the votes will still be contested in some states; however, if I recall correctly, they can only be contested if the margin is within a questionable range.  But we have also entered an unprecedented territory this election with so many mail-in votes that they may be able to challenge and contest votes until they win.
@Victoria33 would certainly be able to enlighten us on the rules; and if she has already done so, I apologize for missing her input.
@libertybele
@Cyber Liberty

Each state has its own percentage number of difference between the two candidates.  If neither reached that number, it is too close to call, so a recount is held with the state paying for it. 

Also, if a candidate's votes are close to the other candidate, but over the amount the state would pay for it, the "loser" at the moment, can request a recount and the candidate wanting the recount, pays for it.

In one county where I lived, a strange thing happened.  Now, follow this:
In a PRIMARY, There was a tie between two commissioner candidates.  Each candidate agreed to abide by a coin toss.  The Houston newspaper's covered this event.  Both candidates stood on an open balcony on the second floor.  The coin was tossed into the air and landed on the marble first floor.   So, one candidate won the coin toss.  Everyone thought he would be the Commissioner after the general election since no one was running against him.

Now, my husband was not the Republican County Chair at that time; there was no Republican Party in the county.  My husband was very bright and what he did caused a new law to be written so no one could do that again.  What did he do?

He wanted the guy who lost the coin toss, to win.  He had the guy sign up to be a write-in  candidate for the Nov. election.  Now the guy who won the coin toss, had his opponent back again.  The write-in guy won.  The coin winner man, lost.

This had never happened before in the state of Texas.  They made a new law that a candidate cannot run twice against the same candidate in the same election.

Offline libertybele

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57,994
  • Gender: Female
Thank you @Victoria33  --- I'm assuming that there are set rules also for counting mail-in votes?  I'm reading that some precincts are asking for extended time to count these ballots and I see a lot of opportunity for fraud and corruption to take place.
Romans 12:16-21

Live in harmony with one another; do not be haughty, but associate with the lowly, do not claim to be wiser than you are.  Do not repay anyone evil for evil, but take thought for what is noble in the sight of all.  If it is possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all…do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.

Offline Victoria33

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,457
  • Gender: Female
Thank you @Victoria33  --- I'm assuming that there are set rules also for counting mail-in votes?  I'm reading that some precincts are asking for extended time to count these ballots and I see a lot of opportunity for fraud and corruption to take place.
@libertybele
@Cyber Liberty

Yes, there are definite rules to evaluate mail-in ballots.  All states have law rules for this and they are seldom very different. First, there is a difference between states as to the date mail ballots have to arrive at the central counting station. 

Texas law says the ballots must be in by the last regular mail delivery on election day.  Each county can start evaluating mail ballots any number of days before election day.  I started our Board three days before election day; then on election day we evaluated the ballots that came in that day by regular mail.  THERE IS AN EXCEPTION FOR MILITARY BALLOTS.  They can come in three days after the election and be counted.

It is distressing that Penn. and a few other states, cannot evaluate a mail ballot until election night.  These states need to change their law.

On TV, maybe that was yesterday, a reporter went into the area where a state was evaluating ballots.  I watched that and it is the same system as we do in Texas.

Here it is:
There is an equal number of Democrats and Republicans working on ballots.  A Judge is there to direct traffic and answer questions; that is what I did.  Always a Dem and Rep together working on a ballot.

A group of people in one area, were looking at the envelope the ballot materials were in.  If there was no signature on the back of the envelope, they were sent to another group of people.  They did have a step here that Texas does not do.  This second group tried to call the voter to tell him/her there is no signature and do they want to come there and sign it.  If the voter does not want to do that, that ballot is not counted.  The rejected envelopes are put in a rejected stack.

The next group to get the envelopes with a signature, compares that signature with the signature on the application for a ballot.  If the two are the same, the envelope goes to another group.  If the signatures do not match, the ballot is rejected and put in the rejected stack.  Now, some states do not require an application as they send mail ballots to everyone, so the signature on the envelope is compared to their signature on their application to be a voter.

The accepted ballots in their Security Envelope goes to another group.  They take the ballots out of the Security Envelope and put the accepted ballots in stacks.  On election day, those accepted paper ballots plus early voting ballots if they use paper ballots, are sent to central counting to be put in machines and be counted.

The Judge of the Early Ballot Board or whatever they call that Board in that state, must have a list of voters and their addresses whose ballots were rejected and why they were rejected and Judge sends a letter to each voter telling voter why the ballot was rejected.

Let's go one step further:
Now the paper ballots from mail and paper ballots from early voting if they use paper ballots for that, go to the machines to be counted.  The voter made a mark on the candidate they wanted.  Wait, the machine just dumped one ballot out.  Why?  The voter marked two people for the same office.  The machine dumped another one.  Why?  There is a hole in the paper.  Another one is dumped.  Why?  The voter wrote down the candidates they wanted, did not make the mark.  Paper ballots may have write-in candidates on it.  Machine will kick it out.

All these ballots to go the "Resolution Committee".  This is a group with an equal number or Democrats and Republicans.  A Democrat and a Republican look at a ballot and try to "fix it" so the machine will accept it.  Numerous times, they know what the voter wanted but the ballot itself is damaged and machine will not take it.  A new ballot is prepared and the Judge of this committee signs the back of the new ballot so it is a legal ballot.  The bad ballot is attached to the new one so the people at the machine know what to do and the bad ballot is kept in a special place for such ballots.

OK, finished this.


« Last Edit: November 01, 2020, 10:00:33 pm by Victoria33 »

Offline libertybele

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57,994
  • Gender: Female
@libertybele
@Cyber Liberty

Yes, there are definite rules to evaluate mail-in ballots.  All states have law rules for this and they are seldom very different. First, there is a difference between states as to the date mail ballots have to arrive at the central counting station. 

Texas law says the ballots must be in by the last regular mail delivery on election day.  Each county can start evaluating mail ballots any number of days before election day.  I started our Board three days before election day; then on election day we evaluated the ballots that came in that day by regular mail.  THERE IS AN EXCEPTION FOR MILITARY BALLOTS.  They can come in three days after the election and be counted.

It is distressing that Penn. and a few other states, cannot evaluate a mail ballot until election night.  These states need to change their law.

On TV, maybe that was yesterday, a reporter went into the area where a state was evaluating ballots.  I watched that and it is the same system as we do in Texas.

Here it is:
There is an equal number of Democrats and Republicans working on ballots.  A Judge is there to direct traffic and answer questions; that is what I did.  Always a Dem and Rep together working on a ballot.

A group of people in one area, were looking at the envelope the ballot materials were in.  If there was no signature on the back of the envelope, they were sent to another group of people.  They did have a step here that Texas does not do.  This second group tried to call the voter to tell him/her there is no signature and do they want to come there and sign it.  If the voter does not want to do that, that ballot is not counted.  The rejected envelopes are put in a rejected stack.

The next group to get the envelopes with a signature, compares that signature with the signature on the application for a ballot.  If the two are the same, the envelope goes to another group.  If the signatures do not match, the ballot is rejected and put in the rejected stack.  Now, some states do not require an application as they send mail ballots to everyone, so the signature on the envelope is compared to their signature on their application to be a voter.

The accepted ballots in their Security Envelope goes to another group.  They take the ballots out of the Security Envelope and put the accepted ballots in stacks.  On election day, those accepted paper ballots plus early voting ballots if they use paper ballots, are sent to central counting to be put in machines and be counted.

The Judge of the Early Ballot Board or whatever they call that Board in that state, must have a list of voters and their addresses whose ballots were rejected and why they were rejected and Judge sends a letter to each voter telling voter why the ballot was rejected.

Let's go one step further:
Now the paper ballots from mail and paper ballots from early voting if they use paper ballots for that, go to the machines to be counted.  The voter made a mark on the candidate they wanted.  Wait, the machine just dumped one ballot out.  Why?  The voter marked two people for the same office.  The machine dumped another one.  Why?  There is a hole in the paper.  Another one is dumped.  Why?  The voter wrote down the candidates they wanted, did not make the mark.  Paper ballots may have write-in candidates on it.  Machine will kick it out.

All these ballots to go the "Resolution Committee".  This is a group with an equal number or Democrats and Republicans.  A Democrat and a Republican look at a ballot and try to "fix it" so the machine will accept it.  Numerous times, they know what the voter wanted but the ballot itself is damaged and machine will not take it.  A new ballot is prepared and the Judge of this committee signs the back of the new ballot so it is a legal ballot.  The bad ballot is attached to the new one so the people at the machine know what to do and the bad ballot is kept in a special place for such ballots.

OK, finished this.

Thank you so much for the information @Victoria33   Have wonderful rest of your day! happy77
Romans 12:16-21

Live in harmony with one another; do not be haughty, but associate with the lowly, do not claim to be wiser than you are.  Do not repay anyone evil for evil, but take thought for what is noble in the sight of all.  If it is possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all…do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.

Online rustynail

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6,212
It's about "Who pays for a recount?"  If it's within a threshold like 0.5% (probably varies between the states) the recount is automatic and the State pays for it.  Outside of that, a recount can still happen, but somebody else has to pay.  I believe Clinton payed for a couple of states to have a recount in 2016.

The Brooks Brothers riot rides again.


Offline sneakypete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 52,963
  • Twitter is for Twits
@libertybele
@Cyber Liberty

Quote
It is distressing that Penn. and a few other states, cannot evaluate a mail ballot until election night.  These states need to change their law.


@libertybele   @Cyber Liberty

How are they supposed to know how many votes they need to find if they do that?
Anyone who isn't paranoid in 2021 just isn't thinking clearly!