Author Topic: Breaking the population-environment taboo at EarthX  (Read 264 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Breaking the population-environment taboo at EarthX
« on: May 22, 2019, 12:52:53 pm »

Breaking the population-environment taboo at EarthX


Published: 
Thu, May 16th 2019 @ 4:11 pm EDT  by  Jeremy Beck

Last month, we did our small part to break what David Attenborough calls the "bizarre taboo" that prevents an open discussion about the connection between population size and the environment from taking place. Obviously, the number of people in any given space has an impact on the environment of that space. When the first Earth Day took place several decades ago, this wasn't just accepted, it was at the very core of the movement. But we don't talk about it much any more.

EarthX in Dallas is a great place to break the taboo because Texas loses 20,000 acres of open space every two months largely because Texas adds another 8,500 people every week. Texas is a big place but most of the population growth occurs in the urban triangle between Dallas, San Antonio and Houston. Like most cities throughout human civilization, these three Texas towns are developed on or near the richest natural resources that the Lone Star State has to offer. That so many people from within the state, the country and around the world are moving to the urban triangle is a testament to what Texas is doing right. But that growth and development have consequences as natural resources and habitat areas are broken up or developed over completely. There are tradeoffs.

https://www.numbersusa.com/blog/breaking-population-environment-taboo-earthx

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36,881
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
Re: Breaking the population-environment taboo at EarthX
« Reply #1 on: May 22, 2019, 11:39:08 pm »
Back when I was a young boy, the population of the United States was about 140 million.

Looking back that seems about right to me.

The greater the number of people crammed in against each other, the lesser the amount of "freedom" available. That's how I see it, and I ain't changin' my mind!