What was Strzok doing investigating for the FBI without a security clearance?

[endicom]

American Thinker
Monica Showalter
July 8, 2018

In the intelligence world, a security clearance, especially a really high one, is not only the job requirement, it's the ultimate status object. It shields one from having to answer questions from curious outsiders, and it gives a wide berth for actions that other people are not allowed to do, such as surveillance and spying

So why was Peter Strzok running around without a security clearance, in the nation's top counterintelligence outfit, as its director of counterintelligence?

This is so baffling.

Here is the tweet from investigative reporter Paul Sperry, seconded by Sundance over at Conservative Treehouse:

More... https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/07/what_was_strzok_doing_investigating_for_the_fbi_without_a_security_clearance.html

[WilliamVA]

American Thinker
Monica Showalter
July 8, 2018

In the intelligence world, a security clearance, especially a really high one, is not only the job requirement, it's the ultimate status object. It shields one from having to answer questions from curious outsiders, and it gives a wide berth for actions that other people are not allowed to do, such as surveillance and spying

So why was Peter Strzok running around without a security clearance, in the nation's top counterintelligence outfit, as its director of counterintelligence?

This is so baffling.

Here is the tweet from investigative reporter Paul Sperry, seconded by Sundance over at Conservative Treehouse:

More... https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/07/what_was_strzok_doing_investigating_for_the_fbi_without_a_security_clearance.html

The question should be since when do government employee's take "routine polygraph's" relating to their
Security Clearance...based on experience..never.  Polygraphs are unreliable.  Though I can think of no reason to
support or defend Strzok, by my reading his clearance was in force until the day they removed him from, and
apparently he has been "read out", because he knew what he could not talk about to a Congressional Committee.
I think we have a little bit of sensationalism, or fake news going on with the above blogs.

[endicom]

The question should be since when do government employee's take "routine polygraph's" relating to their
Security Clearance...based on experience..never.  Polygraphs are unreliable.  Though I can think of no reason to
support or defend Strzok, by my reading his clearance was in force until the day they removed him from, and
apparently he has been "read out", because he knew what he could not talk about to a Congressional Committee.
I think we have a little bit of sensationalism, or fake news going on with the above blogs.

The question then would be when Strzok lost his security clearance. Do you know when?

[Oceander]

The question then would be when Strzok lost his security clearance. Do you know when?

Apparently some time in the last few months. 

[truth_seeker]

It fascinates me if anybody discussing Security Clearances, has ever had one?

Mine, yes=Secret

[endicom]

"After Strzok was recently removed from official responsibility within the FBI, his security clearances were retroactively revoked.  That revocation was due to OPR review and was a retroactive revocation action initiated by career officials within the FBI to cover-up (ie. CYA) the two-and-a-half years he was allowed to work when he should not have been."


https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/07/06/yes-its-true-peter-strzok-failed-his-polygraph-yet-retained-security-clearance-and-position-on-two-investigations/

[Sanguine]

Bookmark.