Breaking: Lou Dobbs Reports: DOJ has just lifted the gag order on the FBI informant

[libertybele]

Don't think so.  I want her in jail for the rest of her life.  With no booze.

Yeppers ... and no passing 'Go' and no collecting $200.

[Emjay]

Death by suicide with a 150 year old derringer. Shot himself twice in the head before tossing the gun 30 feet uphill, dressed in a suit covered with carpet fibers that matched the rug in a car trunk.

How did they get by with that?  We all knew the truth.

And the media was on it hard ... oh, wait.

[edpc]

Death by suicide with a 150 year old derringer. Shot himself twice in the head before tossing the gun 30 feet uphill, dressed in a suit covered with carpet fibers that matched the rug in a car trunk.

It was a .38 revolver and it was still in his hand.  What’s suspicious is that it wasn’t flung (victims often will, due to the reflex) and the grip had no prints.

[DB]

The parties involved have had along time to get rid of any evidence. And they operated at the highest levels of government with all the levers of power at their disposal.

I'll be shocked at this point if anything really comes of this.

[libertybele]

The parties involved have had along time to get rid of any evidence. And they operated at the highest levels of government with all the levers of power at their disposal.

I'll be shocked at this point if anything really comes of this.

Agreed, though obviously there is enough remaining evidence to bring this into focus to lift the gag order and there is still the involvement of Rosenstein and Mueller which has been brought into focus.  If there wasn't enough evidence this wouldn't be coming to light.  I have a glimmer of hope. Right now Clinton is spending her time lying and denying about Trump's dossiers ... she's now stating (CNN report) that she knew nothing about the dossier before it was published and is trying to flip the tables saying that a Trump firm released e-mails to WikiLeaks.

She's playing her usual he-said she-said game and trying to flip the tables and trying to make the dossier the focus.

The fact that the MSM is still not reporting on the gag order being lifted on Uranium One and Clinton not making any statement (at least that I could find) indicates she does not want any focus whatsoever on that issue; a sign that this could blow up in her face soon.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/26/politics/hillary-clinton-dossier-buzzfeed/index.html

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/25/politics/cambridge-analytica-julian-assange-wikileaks-clinton-emails/index.html

[libertybele]

DeSantis comments:

This is a rush transcript from "Your World," October 25, 2017. This copy may not be in its final form and may be updated.

.......Twenty percent of our uranium at stake in this deal with the Russian-backed company Uranium One, all the while, Bill Clinton is getting $500,000 to give a 20-minute speech. You have millions of dollars going into the Clinton Foundation.

And we knew obviously a lot of that. That should have been investigated by now, to be honest. But here we are.

But then we have this confidential informant who I believe is going to come forward very soon either by being released from the Justice Department or pursuant to a subpoena. He was an informant a year-and-a-half leading up to the CFIUS board approving this deal.

So, he's in there with bribery, racketeering with all these Russians. So, how could that deal have gone through without that information not being disclosed to Congress? And what about some of the CFIUS board members?

Eric Holder was one of the members of that board. I would assume he would have to know that such an investigation was going on. Was that something that he disclosed to the other board members?

It's a very questionable policy decision that was made, and there were Republicans in the Congress at the time who complained on the policy grounds.

But then when you undergird it with potential bribery and racketeering, this thing stinks to high heaven. ......

http://www.foxnews.com/transcript/2017/10/25/rep-desantis-speaks-out-about-uranium-one-investigation.html

[IsailedawayfromFR]

The parties involved have had along time to get rid of any evidence. And they operated at the highest levels of government with all the levers of power at their disposal.

I'll be shocked at this point if anything really comes of this.

So there is actually is no informant?  Would he/she be via testimony contributing 'evidence'?

Did someone murder the informant so as 'to get rid of any evidence'?  Is that what you are saying?

[Emjay]

I hate Outnumbered on Fox.  All those female voices screeching at some dude.  But I'm taping it right now because they have a fairly impressive guy on who seems to be knowledgeable about this.

[Sanguine]

I hate Outnumbered on Fox.  All those female voices screeching at some dude.  But I'm taping it right now because they have a fairly impressive guy on who seems to be knowledgeable about this.

Let us know who it is and what he says?

[mrclose]

I suggest the informant be very, very careful.  Unlike Ron Brown, Vince Foster, Peter W. Smith, Berta Caceres, and on.

I would be worried if the informant was managed by anyone else.

Victoria Toensing is, I'm sure, well aware of the dangers and has taken necessary steps to protect him.

Bits and pieces that I've gathered from various sources:

Victoria Toensing

In 1981, Toensing became chief counsel to Arizona Senator Barry Goldwater on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, where she helped draft the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982.

In 1984, she joined the Reagan administration as a deputy assistant attorney general, where she headed the "Terrorism Unit", the first working group in the Department of Justice to investigate and prosecute terrorism-related crimes.

As part of her work in the Department of Justice (DoJ), Toensing managed the government's legal efforts during the terrorist hijacking of TWA Flight 847, the bombing of Pan Am flight 103 and the takeover of the cruise ship Achille Lauro.
She also supervised savings and loan fraud cases, prosecuted nuclear industry regulation cases, securities fraud, and fraud and bribery in the banking industry.

In March 2005 Toensing submitted an amicus curiae brief on behalf of Matt Cooper and Judith Miller, two journalists who were subpoenaed in the Valerie Plame investigation for refusing to reveal information obtained from confidential sources.

In the brief, she "argued that the law couldn't have been broken when Valerie Plame's cover as a CIA agent was blown because her status wasn't really covert."

She also contended that Ms. Plame did not have a cover to be blown, citing a July 23, 2004, article in the Washington Times which argued that Valerie Plame's status as an undercover CIA agent may have been known to Russian and Cuban intelligence operations prior to the article (by Robert Novak) that revealed her status as a CIA employee.

In 1988, she entered private practice.

[Bigun]

I would be worried if the informant was managed by anyone else.

Victoria Toensing is, I'm sure, well aware of the dangers and has taken necessary steps to protect him.

Bits and pieces that I've gathered from various sources:

Victoria Toensing

In 1981, Toensing became chief counsel to Arizona Senator Barry Goldwater on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, where she helped draft the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982.

In 1984, she joined the Reagan administration as a deputy assistant attorney general, where she headed the "Terrorism Unit", the first working group in the Department of Justice to investigate and prosecute terrorism-related crimes.

As part of her work in the Department of Justice (DoJ), Toensing managed the government's legal efforts during the terrorist hijacking of TWA Flight 847, the bombing of Pan Am flight 103 and the takeover of the cruise ship Achille Lauro.
She also supervised savings and loan fraud cases, prosecuted nuclear industry regulation cases, securities fraud, and fraud and bribery in the banking industry.

In March 2005 Toensing submitted an amicus curiae brief on behalf of Matt Cooper and Judith Miller, two journalists who were subpoenaed in the Valerie Plame investigation for refusing to reveal information obtained from confidential sources.

In the brief, she "argued that the law couldn't have been broken when Valerie Plame's cover as a CIA agent was blown because her status wasn't really covert."

She also contended that Ms. Plame did not have a cover to be blown, citing a July 23, 2004, article in the Washington Times which argued that Valerie Plame's status as an undercover CIA agent may have been known to Russian and Cuban intelligence operations prior to the article (by Robert Novak) that revealed her status as a CIA employee.

In 1988, she entered private practice.

Her husband ain't no slouch either! 

https://www.dcbar.org/bar-resources/publications/washington-lawyer/articles/february-2013-legends-in-the-law.cfm

[DB]

So there is actually is no informant?  Would he/she be via testimony contributing 'evidence'?

Did someone murder the informant so as 'to get rid of any evidence'?  Is that what you are saying?

You have no idea what this informant is going to say. It could be "I don't recall"... I can't count the number of times I've read/heard the Clintons were going down "this time"... The "evidence" has never mattered in the past.

[aligncare]

Except that the informants attorney, Victoria Toensing has said they have the goods. His testimony before the house and senate committees should break this case wide-open.

[Sanguine]

Except that the informants attorney, Victoria Toensing has said they have the goods. His testimony before the house and senate committees should break this case wide-open.

I sure hope so!

[DB]

Except that the informants attorney, Victoria Toensing has said they have the goods. His testimony before the house and senate committees should break this case wide-open.

They had "the goods" with top secret government documents found on a hacked private unsecured Email server that the Clintons ran. That didn't matter. How about those missing FBI files that Hillary "didn't have" found in the Clinton White House? Both are felonies.

[aligncare]

They had "the goods" with top secret government documents found on a hacked private unsecured Email server that the Clintons ran. That didn't matter. How about those missing FBI files that Hillary "didn't have" found in the Clinton White House? Both are felonies.

We are in a different environment now. Facts have changed. The democrats want Hillary gone. Once you no longer serve their purposes, the left is through with you and you are gone.

[libertybele]

We are in a different environment now. Facts have changed. The democrats want Hillary gone. Once you no longer serve their purposes, the left is through with you and you are gone.

True. IF 'they' bring her down, she's not going to go down alone.  She'll squeal if she's held responsible and she'll take Bammy and Holder down with her.

[IsailedawayfromFR]

You have no idea what this informant is going to say. It could be "I don't recall"... I can't count the number of times I've read/heard the Clintons were going down "this time"... The "evidence" has never mattered in the past.

Any time one gets 'evidence', one never knows beforehand whether it supports or contrasts with a crime.  It could be nothing at all.

Why did you think I had an idea of what an informant might say?  I simply stated a statement from an informant is evidence itself, in contrast to what was previously stated.