Author Topic: Who Are You Calling Anti-Science?  (Read 659 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Who Are You Calling Anti-Science?
« on: Thursday, Apr 06, 2017 06:51 am »
Who Are You Calling Anti-Science?

Those who reject vaccines or the climate consensus often embrace other legitimate areas of research

    By Troy H. Campbell, Lauren Griffin on April 6, 2017
 

In a couple of weeks, crowds will march nationwide in the March for Science. It’s part of a recent trend pushing back against “anti-science” attitudes that have become all the more prominent since last November’s elections. However, many at this march may greatly misunderstand the “anti-science” behavior they will be marching against. This misunderstanding may be misguiding us in our attempts to make science actually matter.

People’s relationship with science is much more complex and nuanced than "pro-science" or "anti-science." We need to correct some of the misconceptions we have and show that what is often labeled as "anti-science" or “science denial” is often better understood as isolated incidents of motivated bias. In general, trust in science is much higher than we often realize, in part because it includes a lot of people we might often consider “anti-science.”

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/who-are-you-calling-anti-science/
« Last Edit: Thursday, Apr 06, 2017 06:52 am by rangerrebew »

Offline Doug Loss

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 818
  • Gender: Male
  • Proud Tennessean
Re: Who Are You Calling Anti-Science?
« Reply #1 on: Thursday, Apr 06, 2017 08:31 am »
Well, I do call Scientific American a highly politicized shell of a formerly interesting and informative publication.  I subscribed to it for 30+ years till I just couldn't take the political heavy-handedness anymore.
My political philosophy:

1) I'm not bothering anybody.
2) It's none of your business.
3) Leave me alone!

Oceander

  • Guest
Re: Who Are You Calling Anti-Science?
« Reply #2 on: Friday, Apr 07, 2017 02:48 am »
Well, I do call Scientific American a highly politicized shell of a formerly interesting and informative publication.  I subscribed to it for 30+ years till I just couldn't take the political heavy-handedness anymore.

Same here.