Efforts Begin To Challenge States Hillary Clinton Won

[SirLinksALot]

SOURCE: RESISTANCE FEED

URL: http://resistancefeed.com/2016/11/25/efforts-begin-challenge-states-clinton-won/


While it appears that Jill Stein has raised enough money, albeit suspiciously, to start a vote recount in Wisconsin, efforts have begun on the other side to challenge votes in three states won by Hillary Clinton: Colorado, Nevada and Virginia.

Operation Sabot 2016, started by the group Oath Keepers is contesting vote totals in Clark County in Nevada; Denver and Boulder Counties in Colorado; and Richmond, Fairfax, and Henrico Counties in Virginia.

“In all three states there were precincts where over 95 percent of the vote went to Clinton with voter turnouts above 90 percent,” wrote “Navy Jack,” an anonymous Navy veteran leading the Operation Sabot 2016 effort on the Oath Keeper’s website (https://www.oathkeepers.org/navyjack-jill-stein-plans-request-election-recounts/)

“Richmond, Denver and Clark County had precincts with more votes than registered voters,” Navy Jack continued. “This is similar to what occurred in Philadelphia back in 2012. In Virginia, Governor McAuliffe issued 60,000 autopen pardons to allow felons to vote.”

Navy Jack noted that Governor McAuliffe mailed each newly-pardoned felon a personal letter asking them to vote for Hillary Clinton, along with a voter-registration form, ballot and a postage-paid envelope.

“In each of these cases, the President Elect appears to have been disadvantaged,” Navy Jack concluded. “If recounts and investigations become inevitable, expanding the list of states to also include states won by former Secretary Clinton would be appropriate.”

[libertybele]

SOURCE: RESISTANCE FEED

URL: http://resistancefeed.com/2016/11/25/efforts-begin-challenge-states-clinton-won/


While it appears that Jill Stein has raised enough money, albeit suspiciously, to start a vote recount in Wisconsin, efforts have begun on the other side to challenge votes in three states won by Hillary Clinton: Colorado, Nevada and Virginia.

Operation Sabot 2016, started by the group Oath Keepers is contesting vote totals in Clark County in Nevada; Denver and Boulder Counties in Colorado; and Richmond, Fairfax, and Henrico Counties in Virginia.

“In all three states there were precincts where over 95 percent of the vote went to Clinton with voter turnouts above 90 percent,” wrote “Navy Jack,” an anonymous Navy veteran leading the Operation Sabot 2016 effort on the Oath Keeper’s website (https://www.oathkeepers.org/navyjack-jill-stein-plans-request-election-recounts/)

“Richmond, Denver and Clark County had precincts with more votes than registered voters,” Navy Jack continued. “This is similar to what occurred in Philadelphia back in 2012. In Virginia, Governor McAuliffe issued 60,000 autopen pardons to allow felons to vote.”

Navy Jack noted that Governor McAuliffe mailed each newly-pardoned felon a personal letter asking them to vote for Hillary Clinton, along with a voter-registration form, ballot and a postage-paid envelope.

“In each of these cases, the President Elect appears to have been disadvantaged,” Navy Jack concluded. “If recounts and investigations become inevitable, expanding the list of states to also include states won by former Secretary Clinton would be appropriate.”

Good.  It's time to fire back.  It's also time to investigate the reports of votes for Trump that were tallied for Clinton, votes of dead people and votes counted more than once.  After the Bush/Gore voting feud I thought methods were put into place to have an actual paper trail.  While time consuming and certainly a daunting task; going back through the written ballot is really the only solid proof of voter fraud ... and unfortunately though we are relying on those conducting the recount to be honest; something that I am very skeptical about.

[Cripplecreek]

Yay, lets act like democrats.

[montanajoe]

I find it unbelievable that anyone on either side wants to prolong the worst election in history. Geez lets just get the next four years over with..

[Cripplecreek]

I find it unbelievable that anyone on either side wants to prolong the worst election in history. Geez lets just get the next four years over with..

Kinda interesting isn't it?

On the Benghazi thing we have to let Clinton walk "So we can heal" but in the cases of the states she won in the election, lets go out of our way to agitate.

[beandog]

Good.  It's time to fire back.  It's also time to investigate the reports of votes for Trump that were tallied for Clinton, votes of dead people and votes counted more than once.  After the Bush/Gore voting feud I thought methods were put into place to have an actual paper trail.  While time consuming and certainly a daunting task; going back through the written ballot is really the only solid proof of voter fraud ... and unfortunately though we are relying on those conducting the recount to be honest; something that I am very skeptical about.

I agree with you.  Sometimes you have to fight fire with fire.

[HonestJohn]

Well, since both sides dispute the election...

...maybe we need to cancel the results and vote again?

[Chosen Daughter]

Kinda interesting isn't it?

On the Benghazi thing we have to let Clinton walk "So we can heal" but in the cases of the states she won in the election, lets go out of our way to agitate.

Oh, good observation!

[Frank Cannon]

And the shitshow continues. Pardon me while I blow my brains out with a 45 slug.

[Vulcan]

If everything is on the up and up, no one should fear a recount.  So what?

A democRAT recount is not about legitimate counting, it is about manufacturing votes where none existed.  They do so by divining the "intentions" of as many voters as possible or necessary to obtain their desired outcome. 

The fact that the left is always the beneficiary of such "recounts" should be enough to worry all that Hillary and the left, unhappy with the outcome from November 8, are attempting to steal this election.