Thanks much for the update. I didn't think "attack" fit but have a strong bias about using original titles. I didn't realize the same or similar sightings had occurred so widely. What do you believe that signals?
@Quix@CatherineofAragon @mystery-ak I agree the original title should be used for an article due to the one changing the title is putting his/her interpretation there instead of the one used by the originator of the article.
"I didn't realize the same or similar sightings had occurred so widely. What do you believe that signals?"
I think it means it did happen - most likely, the ones sighted in other places besides Turkey, didn't even know about Turkey at the time since this happened in the middle of the night. People in Turkey in numerous cities saw it and those pictures were from all over Turkey, not over just one city.
Back in time to Roswell, New Mexico: (from Wikipedia) "In mid 1947, a United States Air Force balloon, mistaken for a UFO, crashed at a ranch near Roswell, New Mexico, prompting claims that the crash was of an extraterrestrial spaceship.[1] Following wide initial interest, the military stated that the crash was merely of a conventional weather balloon.[2] Interest subsequently waned until the late 1970s, when ufologists began promoting a variety of increasingly elaborate conspiracy theories, claiming that one or more alien spacecraft had crash-landed, and that the extraterrestrial occupants had been recovered by the military, who then engaged in a cover-up."
Wikipedia gives general info. about a subject and it seems they have come down on the side of the whole thing outside Roswell being a promulgated conspiracy. I have every book written about that. On a trip coming back from Las Vegas in about the year 2000, we went to Roswell. Went through their UFO museum and bought books they had and some years after, bought the next books written. (I buy books when I don't know about a subject and I beat the subject to death until I know it all - I have lots of useless information in my brain as a result.)

I believe certain individuals' account of what happened there - their original statements that didn't change over time (such as the man who owned the property where the "craft" crashed). I don't think it was a weather balloon due to the description given by this land owner. I believe the original report in their newspaper (I have a copy of that newspaper), and on their radio station.
I loved the film, "Independence Day" (1996 film), since it included Area 51 and the supposed original "craft" from 1947 being kept there and the saved "in a bottle" outer space alien who they supposedly found that day in 1947.