Author Topic: The Face of Modern Britain: Jihad’s Triumph › Roger Kimball  (Read 69 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 421,951
The Face of Modern Britain: Jihad’s Triumph › Roger Kimball
« on: Sunday, Jun 14, 2026 04:34 am »
The Face of Modern Britain: Jihad’s Triumph › American Greatness
Roger Kimball

It turns out that I have found something to agree with Keir Starmer about. During Ramadan this year, the prime minister described Muslims as “the face of modern Britain.” I think that is correct. Whether it is also something to be happy about is another question. The PM, for his part, couldn’t be more pleased. Muslims in Britain, he went on to say, are “a success story when it comes to diversity.” Was that qualification—“when it comes to diversity”—a nod to reality? Or was it merely his capitulation to some sort of self-imposed linguistic quota according to which he must punctuate two out of three pronouncements with the word “diversity” or go without his pudding?

The jury is still out on that. But it is clear that the prime minister is very concerned about linguistic rectitude. For the last couple of years he has been trying to come up with a definition of “Islamophobia” that he could get past the troublesome partisans of free speech and enroll on the statute books as a hate crime. To date, he has had to compromise and substitute “anti-Muslim hostility” for the crisper-sounding “Islamophobia.”

Longtime readers will know that I have often poked fun at the term “Islamophobia.” Although you can find instances of the word from a century or more ago, the term was popularized in its current sense by the Runnymede Trust, a left-wing British think tank, in 1997. In some ways, the use of “Islamophobia” as a term of abuse was a brilliant move, both psychologically and politically. What a coup to have been able to paint one’s ideological opponents as by definition mentally disturbed. After all, a “phobia” is a species of mental illness, an irrational fear or hatred of something. But the question arises: is it irrational to fear or hate partisans of a religion that explicitly wishes to compass your death or destruction? I ask for the parents of Daniel Pearl, the 3,000 victims of 9/11, and the many thousands of now-deceased people who found themselves on the receiving end of “the religion of peace.”

more
https://amgreatness.com/2026/06/14/the-face-of-modern-britain-jihads-triumph/
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

"Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience"
Mark Twain


“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34


Smokin Joe: Stupid people vote. If you have enough of them, you don’t need to steal an election

Online Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,007
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
Re: The Face of Modern Britain: Jihad’s Triumph › Roger Kimball
« Reply #1 on: Sunday, Jun 14, 2026 02:18 pm »
Roger Kimball:
During Ramadan this year, the prime minister described Muslims as “the face of modern Britain.”

If that isn't fully true yet, it will be before too many more years pass.

The white/native/English/Welsh/Scots population is going to realize it, too.
Recalling the title of an obscure song by Dylan: "I'd hate to be you on that dreadful day".

But after this realization comes another, darker one:
There will be nothing they can do about it, short of an all-out Civil War.

Even if the English whites begin to show the will for such a struggle, how are they going to fight it? They've no weapons, and those who DO will have those weapons pointed against them.

And if the white English beat all odds to win, what will they do with the millions of nonwhites who will still be there afterwards?

My guess/prediction is that when britain finally tips to britanistan, we'll see a white exodus from the [no longer "English"] island that makes the previous "Exodus" seem minor by comparison.

Final question:
Where will they go?