The Army wants to use bullets, mortars, and artillery to take out small drones

[rangerrebew]

The Army wants to use bullets, mortars, and artillery to take out small drones
How existing systems are being shaped to shoot at tiny targets.
Meghann Myers | March 26, 2026
Army Drones
   
HUNTSVILLE, Alabama—Army leaders often say they want to stop using million-dollar missiles to shoot down thousand-dollar drones. One of the solutions may be cheap munitions the service already has.

While the Army is leading an interagency task force to source dedicated counter-drone systems, the Capability Program Executive for ammunition and energetics is taking a look at the Army’s existing rounds to make them capable of shooting down much smaller targets.

“We all know how important missiles are to the fight. We see it in the news. But there's also a point where missiles can't get after every munition, every threat, so we need to supplement that with something that we already have within our formations,” Kaitlyn Tani, deputy project manager at Maneuver Ammunition systems, said Wednesday at the AUSA Global Force Symposium.

There has already been demonstrated success in using bullets against drones, she said, particularly ones like the XM121 High Explosive Proximity round, a 30mm bullet that only needs to get near a target to take it out with its blast radius.

https://www.defenseone.com/technology/2026/03/army-wants-use-bullets-mortars-and-artillery-rounds-take-out-small-drones/412392/?oref=d1-skybox-hp

[rangerrebew]

I don't care what they use as long as it isn't the result of some dumbass woke experiment and does, in fact, work.

[BobfromWB]

The Army wants to use bullets, mortars, and artillery to take out small drones
How existing systems are being shaped to shoot at tiny targets.
Meghann Myers | March 26, 2026
Army Drones
   
HUNTSVILLE, Alabama—Army leaders often say they want to stop using million-dollar missiles to shoot down thousand-dollar drones. One of the solutions may be cheap munitions the service already has.

While the Army is leading an interagency task force to source dedicated counter-drone systems, the Capability Program Executive for ammunition and energetics is taking a look at the Army’s existing rounds to make them capable of shooting down much smaller targets.

“We all know how important missiles are to the fight. We see it in the news. But there's also a point where missiles can't get after every munition, every threat, so we need to supplement that with something that we already have within our formations,” Kaitlyn Tani, deputy project manager at Maneuver Ammunition systems, said Wednesday at the AUSA Global Force Symposium.

There has already been demonstrated success in using bullets against drones, she said, particularly ones like the XM121 High Explosive Proximity round, a 30mm bullet that only needs to get near a target to take it out with its blast radius.

https://www.defenseone.com/technology/2026/03/army-wants-use-bullets-mortars-and-artillery-rounds-take-out-small-drones/412392/?oref=d1-skybox-hp

Yet somehow [ like magic? ] the Ukraine anti-drone FPVs, costing $2000-2500, manage to take out 95% of the Russian drones.

By the time a troop hears a drone nearby, its already too late, as proven in real combat.

But then Ukrainians don't meet the US dress code, and so, no one in the US will consider them in the slightest - best to reinvent the wheel, than use the ones already in the field.

[Smokin Joe]

Yet somehow [ like magic? ] the Ukraine anti-drone FPVs, costing $2000-2500, manage to take out 95% of the Russian drones.

By the time a troop hears a drone nearby, its already too late, as proven in real combat.

But then Ukrainians don't meet the US dress code, and so, no one in the US will consider them in the slightest - best to reinvent the wheel, than use the ones already in the field.

I admit, I am all for what works. I don't give a damn whether it wears a tie or not.

Get what works now, and experiment with other sh*t later.

[Cyber Liberty]

Yet somehow [ like magic? ] the Ukraine anti-drone FPVs, costing $2000-2500, manage to take out 95% of the Russian drones.

By the time a troop hears a drone nearby, its already too late, as proven in real combat.

But then Ukrainians don't meet the US dress code, and so, no one in the US will consider them in the slightest - best to reinvent the wheel, than use the ones already in the field.

Bullshit! Do you really hate Trump that much?

[Cyber Liberty]

I don't care if we want to use slingshots, let them!

[libertybele]

Yet somehow [ like magic? ] the Ukraine anti-drone FPVs, costing $2000-2500, manage to take out 95% of the Russian drones.

By the time a troop hears a drone nearby, its already too late, as proven in real combat.

But then Ukrainians don't meet the US dress code, and so, no one in the US will consider them in the slightest - best to reinvent the wheel, than use the ones already in the field.

Last I had heard Z was over in the ME offering some help so it would seem that he's been given some attention, though I also read that he is concerned because he isn't getting the attention he was getting prior to the U.S. being involved in the conflict with Iran. He's not getting the funding he needs.

That could be nothing but a rumor ... as well as the Ukranians not meeting U.S. dress code ( )

I'm not a fan of Z any more than you are a fan of Trump's.  However, Trump is our President and he has done extraordinarily well for our country! 

[libertybele]

I don't care if we want to use slingshots, let them!

[Hoodat]

Ukraine uses weighted nets, among other things.


How Ukraine Uses Net-Firing Drones To Snag Russian UAVs