Melania vs. Hillary
Kevin McCullough
It’s a tale of two First Ladies—and one revealing weekend.
On one side stood Hillary Clinton, re-emerging from political exile to lecture Americans via The Atlantic—a publication whose readership now struggles to justify its own existence—about immigration and Christianity. In her essay, Clinton scolded the United States for enforcing immigration law, accusing the Trump administration of violating what she called Christianity’s “core teachings of dignity, mercy, and compassion.”
It was a remarkable claim—made more remarkable by how little evidence she offered and how much reality she ignored.
Clinton deliberately blurred the line between legal immigration and illegal entry, as though the distinction were morally irrelevant. But every functioning nation on earth recognizes that borders matter, laws matter, and sovereignty matters. Scripture itself affirms the legitimacy of nations, authority, and order. What Clinton presented was not Christian theology—it was political opportunism dressed in religious language.
Nowhere in her essay did she acknowledge the dignity denied to victims of crimes committed by individuals who entered the country illegally—crimes that disproportionately impact women, children, and the poor. According to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), tens of thousands of non-citizens with criminal convictions remain at large due to sanctuary policies and enforcement resistance. Clinton offered no compassion for the families of victims whose lives have been permanently altered—or ended—by preventable violence.
more
https://townhall.com/columnists/kevinmccullough/2026/02/01/melania-vs-hillary-n2670473
