The Stockholm Syndrome of the WestWhy does the West keep accommodating the forces that hate it? Why do societies sympathize with their attackers?https://patriotpost.us/articles/123694?mailing_id=9626&subscription_uuid=ffd98217-7582-4002-bacf-5b9cd4a426f4&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.9626&utm_campaign=digest_combinedQuote:
The West’s response to rising anti-Western violence has become grimly predictable: capitulate to antagonists and silence those who resist. A recent incident at a vigil for victims of the Bondi Beach terror attack crystallized this dynamic.
A serial protester disrupted the memorial with pro-Palestine slogans and demands that Israeli flags be removed. Police escorted her away as she shouted accusations that others were “politicizing” the tragedy — a striking case of projection from someone who had just politicized a moment of mourning.
This episode reveals a broader pattern across the Anglosphere. When confronted with violence, authorities increasingly treat public opposition as the problem rather than the violence itself. The message to citizens is clear: Sit down, be quiet, and perhaps the attacks will stop. It recalls the Victorian-era euphemism “lie back and think of England,” allegedly advice to wives that unwanted intimacy was simply the price of marital security.
Today, populations are told that lowering expectations is the path to peace.
But accepting diminished standards represents an admission of failure from leaders who lack the competence to address fundamental problems. Rather than confronting terrorism, illegal immigration, or social unrest, contemporary politicians practice evasion. They tinker at the margins, hoping issues resolve themselves, ready to claim credit if circumstances improve by chance. This is governance by Dunning-Kruger effect — officials too incompetent to recognize their own incompetence...
Be careful, Be ready, Be prepared.
Buy ammo
