The Bolduc Brief: The Morality of Following Orders in the Military Profession
Story by Donald Bolduc • 19h
The question of whether military personnel should follow orders or disobey them in situations where they believe those orders may be illegal, immoral, or unsafe has long been a critical ethical dilemma faced by professionals in the military. Throughout history, this moral quandary has surfaced in various conflicts, engendering discussions about the responsibilities of service members in obeying their superiors while adhering to principles of justice, human rights, and the rule of law.
The General Standard
Most military personnel navigate their careers without confronting these dilemmas too frequently; however, they must remain vigilant regarding the ethical implications of their orders. Personal standards often guide decision-making in these situations. A commonly accepted framework posits that military personnel should comply with lawful orders unless they are illegal, immoral, or negligently unsafe.
If faced with potentially unethical directives, service members should voice their objections respectfully. Communication regarding concerns is paramount; clarity around those concerns often forms the foundation of constructive dialogue. When a military member believes that following an order may jeopardize moral or legal standards, they must articulate their objections and suggest an alternative course of action while adhering to the chain of command.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/the-bolduc-brief-the-morality-of-following-orders-in-the-military-profession/ar-AA1QUbOs?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=HCTS&cvid=62abad7bef644d86ba6d18810c9d3f80&ei=23
