Author Topic: Federal Appeals Court Allows Trump’s National Guard Deployment in Oregon  (Read 262 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Timber Rattler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,929
  • Conservative Purist and Patriot
https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/federal-appeals-court-allows-trumps-national-guard-deployment-in-oregon-5927391?ea_src=frontpage&ea_med=section-1

Quote
A federal appeals court ruled on Oct. 20 that President Donald Trump may deploy National Guard troops to deal with violence directed against federal immigration facilities in Portland while the case works its way through the lower courts.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit voted 2-to-1 to stay an Oct. 4 order of U.S. District Judge Karin J. Immergut of Oregon, who blocked a move by Trump to deploy members of the Oregon National Guard to Portland.

(snip)

“Defendants are likely to succeed on the merits of their appeal, and ... other stay factors weigh in their favor. We grant Defendants’ motion for a stay pending appeal,” the panel said in its new order.


EXCERPT

As expected the 9th Circuit slapped the Federal District Court for Oregon down hard!

Here's the ruling...the concurrence is something else...a history lesson in Executive use of the military in putting down nascent insurrections in the U.S.  It starts on page 37 of the opinion in the link below.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71554902/61/state-of-oregon-et-al-v-trump-et-al/
« Last Edit: October 20, 2025, 06:49:57 pm by Timber Rattler »
aka "nasty degenerate SOB," "worst of the worst at Free Republic," "Garbage Troll," "Neocon Warmonger," "Filthy Piece of Trash," "damn $#%$#@!," "Silly f'er," "POS," "war pig," "neocon scumbag," "insignificant little ankle nipper," "@ss-clown," "neocuck," "termite," "Uniparty Deep stater," "Never Trump sack of dog feces," "avid Bidenista," "filthy Ukrainian," "war whore," "fricking chump," "psychopathic POS," "depraved SOB," "Never Trump Moron," "Lazarus," and "sock puppet."

"In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act."  ---George Orwell

Offline Wingnut

  • The problem with everything is they try and make it better without realizing the old way is fine.
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,249
  • Gender: Male
Judge Karin J. Immergut of Oregon.  Suck it loser!
You don’t become cooler with age but you do care progressively less about being cool, which is the only true way to actually be cool.

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 408,051
9th Circuit court rules on Trump's National Guard deployment in Portland
A three-judge panel, comprised of two Trump appointees and one Clinton appointee, heard the case last week
By Breanne Deppisch Fox News
Published October 20, 2025 3:51pm EDT

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday ruled that President Donald Trump can deploy Oregon National Guard troops into the city of Portland, delivering a significant victory to the Trump administration as it continues its effort to send federal forces into Democratic-led cities despite a string of recent setbacks in other district and appeals courts.

Judges on the three-member panel ruled 2-1 to authorize Trump's deployment. Judge Ryan Nelson and Judge Bridget Bade, both appointed by Trump, sided with the administration in the majority ruling, with the lone Clinton-appointed judge, Susan Graber, dissented.

"After considering the record at this preliminary stage, we conclude that it is likely that the President lawfully exercised his statutory authority under 10 U.S.C. § 12406(3), which authorizes the federalization of the National Guard when ‘the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States,’" the majority said.

The move has become a political flashpoint as protesters opposing his key policies have clashed with law enforcement. Oregon officials and civil liberties groups say the administration is exaggerating the threat, while Trump allies insist the Guard is needed to restore order.

After a federal judge in Oregon temporarily blocked Trump's attempt to deploy troops to Portland earlier this month, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed to hear the Trump administration’s appeal.

The lower court judge had described Trump's action in her emergency order as "untethered to reality," and one that she said risks "blurring the line between civil and military federal power — to the detriment of this nation."

The appeals court quickly stayed the lower court’s order pending review.

The ruling comes as Trump has sought to deploy hundreds of National Guard troops to Democratic-led cities despite stated opposition from local and state leaders. Senior administration officials have argued that the deployment is a necessary step to crack down on what they say is an uptick in violent crime and protect against threats from protesters, including anti-ICE demonstrations in many downtown areas.

more
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/9th-circuit-court-rules-trumps-national-guard-deployment-portland
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Online Mod2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,726
Topics merged

Offline Wingnut

  • The problem with everything is they try and make it better without realizing the old way is fine.
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,249
  • Gender: Male
What is the liberal activist judge reversal rate these days.  80 90%
You don’t become cooler with age but you do care progressively less about being cool, which is the only true way to actually be cool.

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36,154
They 'allow' it?  Really?  The President being in charge of the Executive branch and holding Executive power?  What next?  Dogs and cats playing together?
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Offline IsailedawayfromFR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,741
They 'allow' it?  Really?  The President being in charge of the Executive branch and holding Executive power?  What next?  Dogs and cats playing together?
Exactly.

This type of journalism is attempting to solidify a rationale that all matters must pass through unelected judges holding lifetime appointments, rather than those the people elected.

That is not constitutionally permitted.
« Last Edit: October 21, 2025, 10:11:37 am by IsailedawayfromFR »
“You will never understand bureaucracies until you understand that for bureaucrats procedure is everything and outcomes are nothing.” Thomas Sowell