Author Topic: Trump wins again as John Roberts joins liberal justices in surprise Supreme Court dissent (Read 1191 times)

rangerrebew · « **on:** September 11, 2025, 10:10:41 am »

Trump wins again as John Roberts joins liberal justices in surprise Supreme Court dissent
Story by Joshua Wilburn•
20h

©By: MEGA
The Supreme Court has cleared the way for the Trump administration to move forward with deep cuts to federal research funding tied to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, marking a significant shift in the government’s approach to scientific investment.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-wins-again-as-john-roberts-joins-liberal-justices-in-surprise-supreme-court-dissent/ss-AA1MiJIM?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=HCTS&cvid=68c2d6f8aaa547e6ab47401bc964cb1e&ei=34

jafo2010 · « **Reply #1 on:** September 23, 2025, 03:24:48 pm »

Justice John Roberts(a George Bush appointment) is frequently on the wrong side of decisions made by the Supreme court.

Cyber Liberty · « **Reply #2 on:** September 23, 2025, 03:37:33 pm »

Justice John Roberts(a George Bush appointment) is frequently on the wrong side of decisions made by the Supreme court.

Like calling O'Bastardcare a "tax," an argument O'Bastard never even made. Roberts is another Suiter.

rustynail · « **Reply #3 on:** September 23, 2025, 03:59:06 pm »

"Roberts joins liberal justices in surprise Supreme Court dissent", happens too often to be a 'surprise'.

Kamaji · « **Reply #4 on:** September 23, 2025, 06:51:13 pm »

Like calling O'Bastardcare a "tax," an argument O'Bastard never even made. Roberts is another Suiter.

A party doesn’t have to state or claim a particular argument for the Court to use it as a basis for a ruling. Hornbook law.

Cyber Liberty · « **Reply #5 on:** September 23, 2025, 06:59:06 pm »

A party doesn’t have to state or claim a particular argument for the Court to use it as a basis for a ruling. Hornbook law.

Ok. Did the court rule in error anywhere in the case?

Kamaji · « **Reply #6 on:** September 23, 2025, 07:00:28 pm »

Ok. Did the court rule in error anywhere in the case?

Not the time or the place to rehash that stupid argument.

Cyber Liberty · « **Reply #7 on:** September 23, 2025, 07:07:16 pm »

Not the time or the place to rehash that stupid argument.

True enough. Ancient history

ETA: Thanks for dropping the mask, even for just a moment....

libertybele · « **Reply #8 on:** September 23, 2025, 07:20:56 pm »

Justice John Roberts(a George Bush appointment) is frequently on the wrong side of decisions made by the Supreme court.

A Bushie appointee .... enough said.