An interesting example of climate propaganda

[rangerrebew]

An interesting example of climate propaganda
By
Joe Bastardi
|
September 3rd, 2025
 
This is an example of the kind of propaganda that was once reserved for other matters, but since a group of people now considers climate to be that kind of matter, they will do the same thing.
 

The strategy, of course, is to say something that does have truth, but then leave out the rest of the picture. Naturally, the graphic attacks volcanoes and solar, both known for natural variability in the climate.

But consider this. The cumulative buildup of heat in the ocean from increased solar and (humor me here) some of the ideas on geothermal
 

explain pretty nicely the buildup over the years of ocean heat. The sudden increase that Tonga and the El Nino represented certainly added to it. You can’t explain the jump from man-made causes, nor the significant drop that has started, so natural causes certainly explain much of the buildup.

https://www.cfact.org/2025/09/03/an-interesting-example-of-climate-propaganda/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=an-interesting-example-of-climate-propaganda&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=an-interesting-example-of-climate-propaganda

[DefiantMassRINO]

Where's the empirical data and evidence to back the claim that warming oceans is 100% caused by humans?

Why is the cutoff for statistcal data 40 years?  What was happening 41 years ago that does not fit their narrative?

Legitimate scientists, not climate alarmist frauds, would not have arbitrarily selected 40 years as a cut off for data.  They would use every vetted means to measure as far back in history as they could.

The sun is setting earlier now.  Is that Global Climate Change?  Or is it just the transition of the Northern Hemisphere from astronomical Summer to astronomical Fall?