Author Topic: Dems Spend $20 Million to Learn Why They Lost Young Men  (Read 1919 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline LMAO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,883
  • Gender: Male
Re: Dems Spend $20 Million to Learn Why They Lost Young Men
« Reply #50 on: June 01, 2025, 11:01:08 am »
What the hell am I looking at?

Is that a woman, a man transitioned to a woman, or hermaphrodite?

Whatever it is, it's already repulsed me from Dems' $20 million effort to understand why men resist their attempts to have men accept Dems as their superiors.



What is her role supposed to be? How exactly does somebody like that reach out to young men? Does she scratch her testicles and fart?

Whatever political consultant hired her to help the Democrat party with younger men should never be a political consultant for anything ever again


Online mountaineer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 62,395
Re: Dems Spend $20 Million to Learn Why They Lost Young Men
« Reply #51 on: June 21, 2025, 05:38:07 pm »
Bad Hombre
@joma_gc
DNC Chair Ken Martin has reportedly expressed deep frustration with Olivia Julianna, the party’s young male outreach coordinator, over her lackluster job performance. Despite the DNC allocating $20 million to attract young male voters, Julianna has failed to organize fundraisers with college fraternities, and new polling shows President Trump’s approval rating among men has surged to 64%.
3:16 PM · Jun 19, 2025


 :silly:
"The spirit of Kukluxism will not die out so long as the Democrat party exists to sympathize with that spirit."
-- Gerrit Smith

Online Wingnut

  • The problem with everything is they try and make it better without realizing the old way is fine.
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,123
  • Gender: Male
Re: Dems Spend $20 Million to Learn Why They Lost Young Men
« Reply #52 on: June 21, 2025, 06:40:59 pm »
Bad Hombre
@joma_gc
DNC Chair Ken Martin has reportedly expressed deep frustration with Olivia Julianna, the party’s young male outreach coordinator, over her lackluster job performance. Despite the DNC allocating $20 million to attract young male voters, Julianna has failed to organize fundraisers with college fraternities, and new polling shows President Trump’s approval rating among men has surged to 64%.
3:16 PM · Jun 19, 2025


 :silly:

I hop that is not at Waffle house.
You don’t become cooler with age but you do care progressively less about being cool, which is the only true way to actually be cool.

Online jmyrlefuller

  • J. Myrle Fuller
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,694
  • Gender: Male
  • Nonpartisan hack
    • Fullervision
Re: Dems Spend $20 Million to Learn Why They Lost Young Men
« Reply #53 on: June 22, 2025, 02:01:24 pm »
What the hell am I looking at?

Is that a woman, a man transitioned to a woman, or hermaphrodite?

Whatever it is, it's already repulsed me from Dems' $20 million effort to understand why men resist their attempts to have men accept Dems as their superiors.


That is just your garden variety "fat chick."

Not sure why she's the "young male" coordinator for the DNC. I've read a lot of her stuff on social media (garden variety Democrat shilling). You catch more flies with honey, and can catch even more honeys being fly. Olivia Julianna is neither.
New profile picture in honor of Public Domain Day 2025

Offline The_Reader_David

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,827
Re: Dems Spend $20 Million to Learn Why They Lost Young Men
« Reply #54 on: June 25, 2025, 02:16:25 pm »
Listen carefully, I'll type slowly so you will understand.  If my fonts make you so upset, YOU push 'ctrl' and the '-' sign.  Then everyone will not have to read your sniveling childishness.

Smokin' Joe gave you a method to make all the fonts on the site large so you can read them all conveniently.  As it is you make your own posts large, but still have to read the posts in normal sized type everyone else posts.  You gave him guff for making what should be a useful suggestion if your reason for using large fonts in your posts is, in fact, difficulty reading small fonts, rather than vanity.  I therefore conclude you use huge fonts because you are vain, since you obviously have no difficulty in reading everyone else's posts to reply to them.
And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know what this was all about.