Author Topic: Is Culture Degeneration Biological or Ideological?  (Read 97 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 178,363
Is Culture Degeneration Biological or Ideological?
« on: May 24, 2025, 12:47:02 pm »
Is Culture Degeneration Biological or Ideological?
Decline
 
05/24/2025

Mises Wire

Jeffery L. Degner
 
 
The process of cultural decay is front of mind for those engaged in the pronatalist movement. The question of how it happens was raised by Robin Hanson in his recent appearance at NatalCon. His goal is to discover what cultural elements have contributed to fertility decline, which he contends will accelerate movement towards a self-destructive way of life. Conversely, he looks to the positive developments that have come before us and they are evidence that “culture is humanity’s superpower.” From his standpoint, this ability has come about because of natural selection and that humans have proven themselves capable of cultural evolution, and now, perhaps, cultural devolution.

Another claim he lays out is that one of the drivers of cultural evolution is the importance of status recognition. The idea goes that humans tend to mimic the behaviors of those perceived to hold lofty stature. For Hanson, one of the most powerful modern status markers is educational attainment. When it comes to marriage formation, he’s onto something here. Indeed, as others have pointed out, this is a primary driver of mate selection in the modern West. Charles Murray has demonstrated that this is, in fact, one of the most important parameters in mate selection since the mid-twentieth century.

For Hanson, this is a poor marker for mate selection, especially if one values a growing population. Just as wealth had been a highly important status marker for marriage in the past, which in his view has previously led to fertility decline—education as a status marker has done the same. If this selection mechanism leads to lower overall fertility, it then arguably turns into cultural decline (something that Hanson doesn’t thoroughly define).

He also distinguished between micro and macro cultures—with smaller peasant groups typifying the former and the modern, nation state embodied in the latter. Hanson observes that macro cultures are susceptible to devolution to a higher degree than smaller, more nimble cultural units. The current state of the West, in his view, is represented by a “global monoculture of elites.”

https://mises.org/mises-wire/culture-degeneration-biological-or-ideological
The unity of government which constitutes you one people is also now dear to you. It is justly so, for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize. But as it is easy to foresee that, from different causes and from different quarters, much pains will be taken, many artifices employed to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth.  George Washington - Farewell Address