Author Topic: US Military: Praetorian Guard or Non-Partisan Policy Instrument?  (Read 1184 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 176,735

US Military: Praetorian Guard or Non-Partisan Policy Instrument?
by Dr. Charlie Black
 
 
03.24.2025 at 06:00am
US Military: Praetorian Guard or Non-Partisan Policy Instrument?
A recent Small Wars Journal article by Frank Sobchak offers a look at the current civil-military relations. Sobchak argues that given President Trump’s tendencies and past behavior, he will inevitably issue illegal orders that threaten to misuse the US military. As such, senior military leaders should prepare in advance for how they will respond to this eventuality. This essay argues that any preemptive actions would be an egregious breach in the special trust and confidence bestowed  by the Commander in Chief and incongruent with Congressional power to regulate the military. The US military was never intended to be a praetorian guard and – as S.L.A Marshal wrote – is not “the sole repository of national honor and national morality.”

The pendulum of politics in our republic perpetually swings back and forth, expressing the change in collective will of our people. Despite the shifting political landscape, our elected leaders must consider the totality of competing issues and craft and implement policies to address those issues, while always remaining accountable to the American people.

Within this complex context, the uniformed military profession must remain non-partisan while also remaining subordinate to civilian direction. The reality is that senior military leaders are appointed and confirmed to assume positions that directly influence and, when directed, implement policy related to military matters. However, it is not the senior military leader, but rather the elected officials who directly exercise the powers vested by the American people.

Within this civil-military framework, the US military is not a praetorian guard—it does not get a formal vote in policymaking. Their role is limited to advising on military matters, and when directed, to perform actions which are directed under the authority of the US’s national command authority. Likewise, the military does not self-determine how and when it will be used.  Our history, much like that of other states, reveals a meandering path of successful steps and missteps in military advice, policy recommendations, and the implementation of policy.

https://smallwarsjournal.com/2025/03/24/us-military-praetorian-guard-or-non-partisan-policy-instrument/
The unity of government which constitutes you one people is also now dear to you. It is justly so, for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize. But as it is easy to foresee that, from different causes and from different quarters, much pains will be taken, many artifices employed to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth.  George Washington - Farewell Address