Montana Considers Becoming First US State To Ban mRNA Vaccine Use

[libertybele]

Montana Considers Becoming First US State To Ban mRNA Vaccine Use

On Friday, February 7, a hearing took place in the Montana state legislature on a bill that would ban the use of mRNA vaccines in humans. The bill was sponsored by State Representative Greg Kmetz with the support of other Republicans, and if it were to pass into law this would mark a first in the United States.

Key facts:

・A bill proposed in the Montana state legislature seeks to outlaw the use of mRNA vaccines in humans.

・mRNA vaccines, such as those used to prevent COVID-19, have been extensively studied and are considered safe and effective.

・The bill contains several misconceptions about mRNA vaccines, such as the false idea that the RNA can integrate into human DNA.

mRNA vaccines came to public prominence during the COVID-19 pandemic, as this technology was used to create arguably the most successful vaccines against the disease, which remain the gold standard for COVID prevention today. Millions of people have received doses of mRNA vaccines manufactured by Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna, and the shots are still being updated to combat more recent virus variants.

Alongside non-mRNA vaccines, such as the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine, these shots are estimated to have saved millions of lives. A 2024 study in The Lancet00179-6/fulltext) suggested that 1.6 million lives (adults over 25) had been saved in the World Health Organization European Region alone between December 2020 and March 2023....................

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/montana-considers-becoming-first-us-state-to-ban-mrna-vaccine-use/ar-AA1yKXsQ?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=1982995ea6774b10af5337cd48ed8a30&ei=77

[Smokin Joe]

Financially successful, but did they stop anyone from getting sick?

People took those shots and still got COVID, some died. Some had serious adverse reactions.

But using the logic that the shots 'saved' anyone and it 'would have been so much worse without them' is something that cannot be scientifically verified.

Face it, all the 'facts' we have about how good they are came from the same people who demanded (useless, even harmful) masks and six foot "social distancing" (that distance something pulled from a warm, dark, and oderiferous orifice, never supported scientifically).
Those same people tried to convince us the virus was zoonotic, and not lab created, too.
$o why would they be lying about how "$afe and effective" the $hots $uppo$edly are?