Author Topic: Energy Experts Say Kamala’s Energy Plan Is ‘Gibberish Designed To Muddy A Record’  (Read 545 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 176,814
Energy Experts Say Kamala’s Energy Plan Is ‘Gibberish Designed To Muddy A Record’
by Nick Pope  Sep 10, 2024
 

The Harris campaign unveiled an explanation of her positions on energy issues on Monday, and the euphemistic language used signals that she has not truly moderated her views, according to energy experts who spoke with the Daily Caller News Foundation. [emphasis, links added]

After Vice President Kamala Harris and her team mostly avoided divulging specifics about her policy stances for weeks, the campaign’s website debuted an “issues” page the day before the only scheduled debate of the 2024 presidential race.


The energy section of her “issues” page does not include a single specific policy position and instead features a heavy dose of vague, euphemistic language meant to disguise her views on energy and environmental issues as more moderate than they truly are, energy experts told the DCNF.

The campaign’s explanation of Harris’s energy views is “the sort of political gibberish designed to muddy a record,” Dan Kish, a senior research fellow at the Institute for Energy Research, told the DCNF.

https://climatechangedispatch.com/energy-experts-say-kamalas-energy-plan-is-gibberish-designed-to-muddy-a-record/
The unity of government which constitutes you one people is also now dear to you. It is justly so, for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize. But as it is easy to foresee that, from different causes and from different quarters, much pains will be taken, many artifices employed to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth.  George Washington - Farewell Address

Offline Smokin Joe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 61,076
  • I was a "conspiracy theorist". Now I'm just right.
Want to know why oil production is at an all time high? It isn't just the Permian Basin boom. It's harder to change the rules to stymie a well that is already producing compared to applying onerous rules to a well that is just in the planning stages. Once it is on line, sure, some pretty onerous requirements can be ginned up, but as far as leases being revoked, or simply not offered, as far as restrictions on completion techniques, that can't be done. The well is already on line.
If she is elected, that production might help defray some of the rise in price, but the CAPEX will end up somewhere else, likely offshore.
How God must weep at humans' folly! Stand fast! God knows what he is doing!
Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

C S Lewis

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,346
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
Joe wrote:
"Once it is on line, sure, some pretty onerous requirements can be ginned up, but as far as leases being revoked, or simply not offered, as far as restrictions on completion techniques, that can't be done. The well is already on line."

Hey, Joe...
If The Party can force working coal mines to close, it can sure as heck do the same to put existing wells out-of-production.

Wait and see...

Online DefiantMassRINO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,246
  • Gender: Male
Biden-Harris approve Putin's Nord Stream 2 pipeline, but reject America's Keystone XL pipeline.  Plus, they gave a crap load of money to Iran, who used that money to buy Hezbelloah defective pagers.
"Political correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it’s entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end." - Alan Simpson, Frontline Video Interview

Offline Smokin Joe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 61,076
  • I was a "conspiracy theorist". Now I'm just right.
Joe wrote:
"Once it is on line, sure, some pretty onerous requirements can be ginned up, but as far as leases being revoked, or simply not offered, as far as restrictions on completion techniques, that can't be done. The well is already on line."

Hey, Joe...
If The Party can force working coal mines to close, it can sure as heck do the same to put existing wells out-of-production.

Wait and see...
I'm not saying it can't happen, but watch some of those CAPEX dollars go to get people out of office.
How God must weep at humans' folly! Stand fast! God knows what he is doing!
Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

C S Lewis