Author Topic: Ad Hominem Backfire in the Energy/Climate Debate  (Read 300 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 184,340
Ad Hominem Backfire in the Energy/Climate Debate
« on: May 21, 2024, 06:40:49 am »
Ad Hominem Backfire in the Energy/Climate Debate
6 hours ago Guest Blogger

By Robert Bradley Jr.

“Get off your high horse, all of us are ‘pro climate’, you just have a different view on how to achieve that. Mr. Bradley interacts with anyone who challenges his statements. As far as your charge that he, “declare a position”? He does so every day. Catch up….” Mark Rohrbacher to Thomas Ortman (below)

Social media exchanges between free market and government energy/climate proponents are an excellent way to understand the arguments, politics, and motivations of all involved. Cancel culture not, may the best ideas win. Here is a LinkedIn exchange of note, where I (and others) rebut a familiar ad hominem. In this case, one Thomas Ortman just … disappeared.

The exchange occurred with a post by Gavin Mooney, self-described “energy transition optimist.”. “Batteries have taken a huge leap forward in California this spring, soaking up solar during the day and discharging it when it’s needed in the evening” he wrote. I responded:

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2024/05/20/ad-hominem-backfire-in-the-energy-climate-debate/
abolitionist Frederick Douglass: “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did, and it never will.”