Author Topic: Representative Nadler Purposely Omits “the People” When Quoting Second Amendment  (Read 1717 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 186,945
Representative Nadler Purposely Omits “the People” When Quoting Second Amendment
Story by Tony Bonnani • 4h
 
In a recent speech, Representative Jerry Nadler made a conspicuous omission while quoting the Second Amendment, raising questions about his intentions and understanding of the amendment’s significance.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/representative-nadler-purposely-omits-the-people-when-quoting-second-amendment/ss-BB1m9Vj0?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=bf1fab5e277e45299a87636a09de5eb6&ei=16
"A great civilization is not conquered from without until it has destroyed itself from within. " -- Ariel Durant

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 186,945
raising questions about his intentions and understanding of the amendment’s significance.

Understanding of the Amendment means absolutely nothing to communists. **nononono*
"A great civilization is not conquered from without until it has destroyed itself from within. " -- Ariel Durant

Offline GtHawk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,874
  • Gender: Male
  • Well EXCUSE me!
 :pondering: Did Nadler leave it out on purpose, or was it because he's just stupid ? I don't think Nadler's brain is functioning much better than Bidens

Offline LMAO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,396
  • Gender: Male
:pondering: Did Nadler leave it out on purpose, or was it because he's just stupid ? I don't think Nadler's brain is functioning much better than Bidens

If he was reading the actual amendment, then he deliberately omitted it
"I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote welfare, for I propose to extend freedom. My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them." Barry Goldwater

https://www.usdebtclock.org/

Offline GtHawk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,874
  • Gender: Male
  • Well EXCUSE me!
If he was reading the actual amendment, then he deliberately omitted it
Oh probably he did, being the leftist he is. I was just asking because he has been in a pretty fast decline since before his last election. There seem to be many on both sides of the aisle that are well past their 'best used by date'.