Home
Help
Login
Register
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
The Briefing Room
»
General Category
»
Climate/Environment
»
Dominion Energy’s absurd reply to CFACT’s whale protection lawsuit
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: Dominion Energy’s absurd reply to CFACT’s whale protection lawsuit (Read 299 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
rangerrebew
TBR Contributor
Posts: 184,526
Dominion Energy’s absurd reply to CFACT’s whale protection lawsuit
«
on:
March 26, 2024, 06:46:38 am »
Dominion Energy’s absurd reply to CFACT’s whale protection lawsuit
By
David Wojick
|
March 26th, 2024
Dominion Energy has issued a brief response to the whale protection lawsuit filed by CFACT et al. When I first saw it I thought there must be some mistake but it has appeared in a lot of press reports.
This central claim by Dominion is simply absurd: “The overwhelming consensus of federal agencies and scientific organizations is that offshore wind does not adversely impact marine life.” No adverse impact? Seriously?
In reality the responsible federal agency predicts an enormous adverse impact.
NOAA‘s National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) has authorized Dominion to acoustically harass almost 80,000 marine mammals and these noise harassments are certainly adverse impacts. They even include temporary deafness which can easily be deadly.
https://www.cfact.org/2024/03/26/dominion-energys-absurd-reply-to-cfacts-whale-protection-lawsuit/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=dominion-energys-absurd-reply-to-cfacts-whale-protection-lawsuit&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=dominion-energys-absurd-reply-to-cfacts-whale-protection-lawsuit
Logged
abolitionist Frederick Douglass: “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did, and it never will.”
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
The Briefing Room
»
General Category
»
Climate/Environment
»
Dominion Energy’s absurd reply to CFACT’s whale protection lawsuit